• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在产生和理解中对假词形式和意义的处理:使用线性判别学习的计算建模方法。

The processing of pseudoword form and meaning in production and comprehension: A computational modeling approach using linear discriminative learning.

机构信息

Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):945-976. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01356-w.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01356-w
PMID:32377973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8219637/
Abstract

Pseudowords have long served as key tools in psycholinguistic investigations of the lexicon. A common assumption underlying the use of pseudowords is that they are devoid of meaning: Comparing words and pseudowords may then shed light on how meaningful linguistic elements are processed differently from meaningless sound strings. However, pseudowords may in fact carry meaning. On the basis of a computational model of lexical processing, linear discriminative learning (LDL Baayen et al., Complexity, 2019, 1-39, 2019), we compute numeric vectors representing the semantics of pseudowords. We demonstrate that quantitative measures gauging the semantic neighborhoods of pseudowords predict reaction times in the Massive Auditory Lexical Decision (MALD) database (Tucker et al., 2018). We also show that the model successfully predicts the acoustic durations of pseudowords. Importantly, model predictions hinge on the hypothesis that the mechanisms underlying speech production and comprehension interact. Thus, pseudowords emerge as an outstanding tool for gauging the resonance between production and comprehension. Many pseudowords in the MALD database contain inflectional suffixes. Unlike many contemporary models, LDL captures the semantic commonalities of forms sharing inflectional exponents without using the linguistic construct of morphemes. We discuss methodological and theoretical implications for models of lexical processing and morphological theory. The results of this study, complementing those on real words reported in Baayen et al., (Complexity, 2019, 1-39, 2019), thus provide further evidence for the usefulness of LDL both as a cognitive model of the mental lexicon, and as a tool for generating new quantitative measures that are predictive for human lexical processing.

摘要

假词长期以来一直是心理语言学词汇研究的重要工具。使用假词的一个常见假设是它们没有意义:因此,比较单词和假词可以揭示有意义的语言元素如何与无意义的声音串不同地被处理。然而,假词实际上可能具有意义。基于词汇处理的计算模型——线性判别学习(LDL)(Baayen 等人,复杂性,2019 年,1-39,2019 年),我们计算表示假词语义的数字向量。我们证明,衡量假词语义邻近度的定量指标可以预测 Massive Auditory Lexical Decision(MALD)数据库中的反应时间(Tucker 等人,2018 年)。我们还表明,该模型可以成功预测假词的声学持续时间。重要的是,模型预测取决于这样一个假设,即言语产生和理解的机制相互作用。因此,假词成为衡量产生和理解之间共鸣的杰出工具。MALD 数据库中的许多假词都包含屈折后缀。与许多当代模型不同,LDL 无需使用形态学的语言结构即可捕获共享屈折词素的形式的语义共性。我们讨论了词汇处理模型和形态理论的方法和理论意义。本研究的结果,补充了 Baayen 等人在真实单词上的研究结果(复杂性,2019 年,1-39,2019 年),为 LDL 作为心理词汇的认知模型以及作为生成对人类词汇处理具有预测性的新定量指标的工具提供了进一步的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/5e95e757d8f6/13428_2020_1356_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/62205a1ec7a6/13428_2020_1356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/994140d97ebe/13428_2020_1356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/c2d0be5f0eeb/13428_2020_1356_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/e8b2a1d73c0c/13428_2020_1356_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/977afe6a390a/13428_2020_1356_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/00368192ebdb/13428_2020_1356_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/55019b68466f/13428_2020_1356_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/ecc315127503/13428_2020_1356_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/5f5a82cedfe9/13428_2020_1356_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/eeb1de51817c/13428_2020_1356_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/79143f80fc16/13428_2020_1356_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/27438acf070f/13428_2020_1356_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/a4750f2afa5e/13428_2020_1356_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/5e95e757d8f6/13428_2020_1356_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/62205a1ec7a6/13428_2020_1356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/994140d97ebe/13428_2020_1356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/c2d0be5f0eeb/13428_2020_1356_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/e8b2a1d73c0c/13428_2020_1356_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/977afe6a390a/13428_2020_1356_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/00368192ebdb/13428_2020_1356_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/55019b68466f/13428_2020_1356_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/ecc315127503/13428_2020_1356_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/5f5a82cedfe9/13428_2020_1356_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/eeb1de51817c/13428_2020_1356_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/79143f80fc16/13428_2020_1356_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/27438acf070f/13428_2020_1356_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/a4750f2afa5e/13428_2020_1356_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b77/8219637/5e95e757d8f6/13428_2020_1356_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The processing of pseudoword form and meaning in production and comprehension: A computational modeling approach using linear discriminative learning.在产生和理解中对假词形式和意义的处理:使用线性判别学习的计算建模方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):945-976. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01356-w.
2
Cognitive neural responses in the semantic comprehension of sound symbolic words and pseudowords.声音象征词和假词语义理解中的认知神经反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Oct 11;17:1208572. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1208572. eCollection 2023.
3
Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.语言结构和意义将神经振荡组织成内容特定的层级。
J Neurosci. 2020 Dec 2;40(49):9467-9475. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0302-20.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
4
On the semantics of nonwords and their lexical category.论非词的语义及其词汇类别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):621-637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
Mind the suffix: Pseudoword processing in children and adults.注意后缀:儿童和成人的伪词加工。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Sep;245:105977. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105977. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
6
Durational Differences of Word-Final /s/ Emerge From the Lexicon: Modelling Morpho-Phonetic Effects in Pseudowords With Linear Discriminative Learning.词尾/s/的时长差异源自词库:用线性判别学习对假词中的形态语音效应进行建模。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:680889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680889. eCollection 2021.
7
How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.从trial-to-trial 学习看心理词汇中的映射关系:用线性判别学习对词汇判断进行建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Nov;146:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
8
Morpho-Phonetic Effects in Speech Production: Modeling the Acoustic Duration of English Derived Words With Linear Discriminative Learning.言语产生中的形态语音效应:运用线性判别学习对英语派生词的声学时长进行建模
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:678712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678712. eCollection 2021.
9
Sharing morphemes without sharing meaning: production and comprehension of German verbs in the context of morphological relatives.共享词素却不共享意义:形态相关语境下德语动词的产出与理解
Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Sep;65(3):173-91. doi: 10.1037/a0023794.
10
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.基于朴素判别学习的视觉理解中形态处理的无定形模型。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;118(3):438-481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851.

引用本文的文献

1
SingleMALD: Investigating practice effects in auditory lexical decision.单通道听觉词汇判定任务中的练习效应研究
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 2;57(5):136. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02628-z.
2
False memories from nowhere: Humans falsely recognize words that are not attested in their vocabulary.凭空而来的错误记忆:人类会错误地识别他们词汇表中未出现过的单词。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02677-7.
3
LDL-AURIS: a computational model, grounded in error-driven learning, for the comprehension of single spoken words.

本文引用的文献

1
A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.简单谈一谈“非词”:在词汇判断任务中,非词的频率、语义近邻密度和正字法到语义一致性效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):157-183. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000819. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
On the semantics of nonwords and their lexical category.论非词的语义及其词汇类别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):621-637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
The Massive Auditory Lexical Decision (MALD) database.
LDL-AURIS:一种基于错误驱动学习的用于理解单个口语单词的计算模型。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jul 21;38(4):509-536. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1954207. eCollection 2023.
4
Discrimination of Second Language Vowel Contrasts and the Role of Phonological Short-Term Memory and Nonverbal Intelligence.第二语言元音对比的辨别以及语音短期记忆和非语言智力的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Feb 4;53(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10038-z.
5
How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.从trial-to-trial 学习看心理词汇中的映射关系:用线性判别学习对词汇判断进行建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Nov;146:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Neural Responses to Novel and Existing Words in Children with Autism Spectrum and Developmental Language Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍和发育性语言障碍儿童对新单词和现有单词的神经反应
J Cogn. 2022 Jan 27;5(1):14. doi: 10.5334/joc.204. eCollection 2022.
7
GECO-CN: Ghent Eye-tracking COrpus of sentence reading for Chinese-English bilinguals.GECO-CN:用于汉英双语者的根特眼动句子阅读语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2743-2763. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01931-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
8
Exposure to co-occurrence regularities in language drives semantic integration of new words.接触语言中的共现规律会促进新单词的语义整合。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(7):1064-1081. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001122. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Morphology in a Parallel, Distributed, Interactive Architecture of Language Production.语言生成的并行、分布式、交互式架构中的形态学
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Mar 3;5:803259. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.803259. eCollection 2022.
10
What Language Disorders Reveal About the Mechanisms of Morphological Processing.语言障碍揭示了形态加工机制的哪些方面。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 29;12:701802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701802. eCollection 2021.
海量听觉词汇决策 (MALD) 数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1187-1204. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1056-1.
4
Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not.狒狒正在学习“正字法”表征吗?可能并非如此。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 31;12(8):e0183876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183876. eCollection 2017.
5
Phonological ambiguity modulates resolution of semantic ambiguity during reading: An fMRI study of Hebrew.语音歧义在阅读过程中调节语义歧义的消解:一项关于希伯来语的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuropsychology. 2017 Oct;31(7):759-777. doi: 10.1037/neu0000357. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit.一种基于错误驱动的学习算法能够以类人的准确率识别出自发性对话语音中的词汇。该算法直接从智能声学特征中区分意义,绕过音素作为识别单元。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0174623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174623. eCollection 2017.
8
Reading homophone puns: Evidence from eye tracking.阅读同音双关语:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Mar;71(1):2-13. doi: 10.1037/cep0000109.
9
Discrimination in lexical decision.词汇判断中的辨别
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0171935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171935. eCollection 2017.
10
Skilled adult readers activate the meanings of high-frequency words using phonology: Evidence from eye tracking.熟练的成年读者利用语音激活高频词汇的含义:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):334-346. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0661-4.