• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国燃煤电厂不可忽略的非标准空气污染物排放:凝聚颗粒物和三氧化硫。

Non-Negligible Stack Emissions of Noncriteria Air Pollutants from Coal-Fired Power Plants in China: Condensable Particulate Matter and Sulfur Trioxide.

机构信息

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation & Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Center for Atmospheric Environmental Studies, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 2;54(11):6540-6550. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00297. Epub 2020 May 20.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c00297
PMID:32379428
Abstract

In this study, we investigated the emission characteristics of condensable particulate matter (CPM) and sulfur trioxide (SO) simultaneously through ammonia-based/limestone-based wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) from four typical coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) by conducting field measurements. Stack emissions of filterable particulate matter (FPM) all meet the Chinese ultralow emission (ULE) standards, whereas CPM concentrations are prominent (even exceed 10 mg/Nm from two CFPPs). We find that NH and Cl increase markedly through the ammonia-based WFGD, and SO is generally the main ionic component, both in CPM and FPM. Notably, the occurrence of elemental Se in FPM and CPM is significantly affected by WFGD. Furthermore, the established chemical profiles in FPM and CPM show a distinct discrepancy. In CPM, the elemental S mainly exists as a sulfate, and the metallic elements of Na, K, Mg, and Ca mainly exist as ionic species. Our results may indicate that not all SO are included in CPM and they co-exist in stack plume. With the substantial reduction of sulfur dioxide (SO), S distributed in SO, CPM, and FPM becomes non-negligible. Finally, the emission factors of CPM and SO under typical ULE technical routes fall in the ranges of 74.33-167.83 and 48.76-86.30 g/(t of coal) accordingly.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们通过在四个典型的燃煤电厂(CFPPs)中进行实地测量,通过基于氨/基于石灰石的湿法烟气脱硫(WFGD)同时研究了可凝结颗粒物(CPM)和三氧化硫(SO)的排放特性。过滤器可捕集颗粒物(FPM)的排放均符合中国超低排放标准(ULE),而 CPM 的浓度则很显著(甚至有两个 CFPP 的浓度超过 10mg/Nm³)。我们发现,基于氨的 WFGD 会明显增加 NH 和 Cl,SO 通常是 CPM 和 FPM 中的主要离子成分。值得注意的是,WFGD 显著影响了 FPM 和 CPM 中元素硒的存在。此外,FPM 和 CPM 中建立的化学特征存在明显差异。在 CPM 中,元素 S 主要以硫酸盐形式存在,而 Na、K、Mg 和 Ca 等金属元素主要以离子形式存在。我们的结果可能表明,并非所有的 SO 都包含在 CPM 中,它们在烟囱羽流中共同存在。随着二氧化硫(SO)的大量减少,分布在 SO、CPM 和 FPM 中的 S 变得不可忽视。最后,在典型的 ULE 技术路线下,CPM 和 SO 的排放因子分别在 74.33-167.83 和 48.76-86.30g/(t 煤)的范围内。

相似文献

1
Non-Negligible Stack Emissions of Noncriteria Air Pollutants from Coal-Fired Power Plants in China: Condensable Particulate Matter and Sulfur Trioxide.中国燃煤电厂不可忽略的非标准空气污染物排放:凝聚颗粒物和三氧化硫。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 2;54(11):6540-6550. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00297. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
Characteristics of PM and PAHs emitted from a coal-fired boiler and the efficiencies of its air pollution control devices.燃煤锅炉排放的颗粒物和多环芳烃特性及其大气污染控制装置的效率。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Jan;72(1):85-97. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1994483. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
3
Study on characteristics of organic components in condensable particulate matter before and after wet flue gas desulfurization system of coal-fired power plants.燃煤电厂湿法烟气脱硫前后可凝结颗粒物中有机成分特征研究。
Chemosphere. 2022 May;294:133668. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133668. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
[Conversion Characterizations of Sulfate Ion and Nitrate Ion in Particulate Matter from Coal-fired Power Plants].[燃煤电厂颗粒物中硫酸根离子和硝酸根离子的转化特征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Oct 8;42(10):4678-4686. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202101097.
5
Study on the removal characteristics of different air pollution control devices for condensable particulate matter in coal-fired power plants.燃煤电厂可凝结颗粒物不同空气污染控制设备去除特性的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(23):34714-34724. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17952-y. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
6
Effects of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization and Wet Electrostatic Precipitators on Emission Characteristics of Particulate Matter and Its Ionic Compositions from Four 300 MW Level Ultralow Coal-Fired Power Plants.湿烟气脱硫和湿式静电除尘器对四个 300MW 级超净燃煤电厂颗粒物排放特性及其离子成分的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Dec 4;52(23):14015-14026. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03656. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
The effect of air pollution control devices in coal-fired power plants on the removal of condensable and filterable particulate matter.燃煤电厂空气污染控制装置对可凝结和可过滤颗粒物去除的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(27):70277-70287. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27246-0. Epub 2023 May 6.
8
[Characteristics of Condensable Particulate Matter in Ultra-low Emission Coal-Fired Power Plants].[超低排放燃煤电厂中可凝结颗粒物的特性]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Apr 8;41(4):1589-1593. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201910091.
9
Investigation on condensable particulate matter emission characteristics in wet ammonia-based desulfurization system.湿氨法脱硫系统中可凝结颗粒物排放特性的研究。
J Environ Sci (China). 2020 Jun;92:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Emission characteristics of PM and components of condensable particulate matter from coal-fired industrial plants.燃煤工业设备排放的颗粒物及其成分的排放特性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:148782. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148782. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Geochemical study on nitrogen isotope composition, speciation distribution, and influencing factors of vitrinite-rich coal seams during the Late Carboniferous.晚石炭世富镜质组煤层氮同位素组成、形态分布及影响因素的地球化学研究
Sci Rep. 2025 May 30;15(1):19095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03810-1.
2
Emissions of Condensable Organic Aerosols from Stationary Combustion Sources over Japan.日本固定燃烧源产生的可凝结有机气溶胶排放
Atmos Environ (1994). 2022 Nov 15;289. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119319.
3
Impacts of condensable particulate matter on atmospheric organic aerosols and fine particulate matter (PM) in China.
中国可凝颗粒物对大气有机气溶胶和细颗粒物(PM)的影响。
Atmos Chem Phys. 2022 Sep 13;22(17):11845-11866. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-11845-2022.
4
Deep Learning-Based Approach for Heat Transfer Efficiency Prediction with Deep Feature Extraction.基于深度学习的热传递效率预测方法及深度特征提取
ACS Omega. 2022 Aug 24;7(35):31013-31035. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03052. eCollection 2022 Sep 6.