Morino Yu, Chatani Satoru, Fujitani Yuji, Tanabe Kiyoshi, Murphy Benjamin N, Jathar Shantanu H, Takahashi Katsuyuki, Sato Kei, Kumagai Kimiyo, Saito Shinji
National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Atmos Environ (1994). 2022 Nov 15;289. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119319.
Treatment of condensable particulate matter (CPM) is key for accurate simulation of atmospheric particulate matter (PM), because conventional stationary combustion source emission surveys do not measure CPM in many countries. This study updates previously estimated CPM emissions from stationary combustion sources in Japan by considering the relationship between the CPM fraction and filterable PM (FPM) concentrations for individual sources rather than using a uniform CPM/FPM ratio for all sources. As a result, the total emissions ratio of condensable organic aerosol (OA) and filterable PM ( ) from stationary combustion sources, based on this update, changes from ~2.0 to 0.20, and the estimated concentrations of condensable OA, averaged over winter and over summer, changes from up to 3 μg m to up to 0.2 μg m. The normalized mean bias for concentration of the simulated organic carbon (OC) in winter changes from -78% ~ -9% to -83% ~ -28%), although the proportion of modern carbon in total carbon is better estimated. The CPM contribution is likely to be overestimated when the source-dependent relationship between the CPM/FPM ratio and FPM concentration is not considered. Thus, accurate knowledge of the CPM/FPM ratio, particularly for sources with high FPM concentrations, is critical to improve CPM emission estimation.
可凝结颗粒物(CPM)的处理是精确模拟大气颗粒物(PM)的关键,因为在许多国家,传统的固定燃烧源排放调查并未对CPM进行测量。本研究通过考虑单个源的CPM分数与可过滤颗粒物(FPM)浓度之间的关系,而非对所有源使用统一的CPM/FPM比率,更新了日本固定燃烧源先前估计的CPM排放量。结果,基于此更新,固定燃烧源中可凝结有机气溶胶(OA)和可过滤颗粒物( )的总排放比率从约2.0变为0.20,冬季和夏季平均的可凝结OA估计浓度从高达3 μg/m³变为高达0.2 μg/m³。冬季模拟有机碳(OC)浓度的归一化平均偏差从-78% ~ -9%变为-83% ~ -28%),尽管总碳中现代碳的比例得到了更好的估计。如果不考虑CPM/FPM比率与FPM浓度之间的源依赖关系,CPM贡献可能会被高估。因此,准确了解CPM/FPM比率,特别是对于FPM浓度高的源,对于改进CPM排放估算至关重要。