Suppr超能文献

在急性缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术的背景下,确定首次通过效应的预测因素及其对临床结果的影响:来自多中心前瞻性登记研究的结果。

Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Results from a multicentric prospective registry.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Hôpital Foch Suresnes FR, University of Versailles Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France.

University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2021 Jan;16(1):20-28. doi: 10.1177/1747493020923051. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The first-pass effect, defined as a complete or near-complete recanalization after one pass (first-pass effect) of a mechanical thrombectomy device, has been related to better clinical outcome than good recanalization after more than one pass in acute ischemic stroke. We searched for predictors of first-pass effect by analyzing the results within a large prospective multicentric registry.

METHODS

We included patients treated by mechanical thrombectomy for isolated anterior intracranial occlusions. A multi-variate logistic regression analysis was carried out to search for predictors of first-pass effect. We also analyzed the percentage of patients with 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2, excellent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0 to 1), 24-h NIHSS change, and 90-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 1832 patients included, clinical outcome at 90 days was significantly better in first-pass effect patients (50.6% vs. 38.9% in patients without first-pass effect), with a center-adjusted OR associated with first-pass effect of 1.74 (95%CI, 1.24 to 1.77). Older age, a lower systolic blood pressure, an MCA-M1 occlusion, higher DWI-ASPECTS at admission, mechanical thrombectomy under local anesthesia, and combined first-line device strategy were independent predictors of first-pass effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a strategy combining thrombectomy and thrombo-aspiration was more effective than other strategies in achieving first-pass effect. In addition, we confirm that clinical outcome was better in patients with first-pass effect compared to non-first-pass effect patients.

摘要

背景

一次通过(first-pass effect),定义为机械取栓装置一次通过后完全或近乎完全再通,与多次通过后良好再通相比,与更好的临床结局相关。我们通过对大型前瞻性多中心登记研究的结果进行分析,寻找一次通过的预测因素。

方法

我们纳入了因孤立性颅内前循环闭塞而行机械取栓治疗的患者。采用多变量逻辑回归分析寻找一次通过的预测因素。我们还分析了 90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0-2 分、良好结局(90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0-1 分)、24 小时 NIHSS 变化和 90 天全因死亡率的患者比例。

结果

在纳入的 1832 例患者中,一次通过的患者临床结局在 90 天显著更好(无一次通过的患者为 38.9%,有一次通过的患者为 50.6%),中心校正后与一次通过相关的 OR 为 1.74(95%CI,1.24 至 1.77)。年龄较大、收缩压较低、MCA-M1 闭塞、入院时 DWI-ASPECTS 较高、局部麻醉下机械取栓和联合一线设备策略是一次通过的独立预测因素。

结论

在这项研究中,联合取栓和血栓抽吸的策略比其他策略更有效地实现一次通过。此外,我们证实与非一次通过患者相比,一次通过患者的临床结局更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验