Department of Toxicology, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Arch Toxicol. 2020 May;94(5):1375-1415. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02725-2. Epub 2020 May 8.
Recently, epidemiological studies have suggested that fluoride is a human developmental neurotoxicant that reduces measures of intelligence in children, placing it into the same category as toxic metals (lead, methylmercury, arsenic) and polychlorinated biphenyls. If true, this assessment would be highly relevant considering the widespread fluoridation of drinking water and the worldwide use of fluoride in oral hygiene products such as toothpaste. To gain a deeper understanding of these assertions, we reviewed the levels of human exposure, as well as results from animal experiments, particularly focusing on developmental toxicity, and the molecular mechanisms by which fluoride can cause adverse effects. Moreover, in vitro studies investigating fluoride in neuronal cells and precursor/stem cells were analyzed, and 23 epidemiological studies published since 2012 were considered. The results show that the margin of exposure (MoE) between no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in animal studies and the current adequate intake (AI) of fluoride (50 µg/kg b.w./day) in humans ranges between 50 and 210, depending on the specific animal experiment used as reference. Even for unusually high fluoride exposure levels, an MoE of at least ten was obtained. Furthermore, concentrations of fluoride in human plasma are much lower than fluoride concentrations, causing effects in cell cultures. In contrast, 21 of 23 recent epidemiological studies report an association between high fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence. The discrepancy between experimental and epidemiological evidence may be reconciled with deficiencies inherent in most of these epidemiological studies on a putative association between fluoride and intelligence, especially with respect to adequate consideration of potential confounding factors, e.g., socioeconomic status, residence, breast feeding, low birth weight, maternal intelligence, and exposure to other neurotoxic chemicals. In conclusion, based on the totality of currently available scientific evidence, the present review does not support the presumption that fluoride should be assessed as a human developmental neurotoxicant at the current exposure levels in Europe.
最近的流行病学研究表明,氟化物是一种人类发育神经毒物,会降低儿童的智力水平,使其与有毒金属(铅、甲基汞、砷)和多氯联苯处于同一类别。如果这是真的,考虑到饮用水的广泛氟化以及氟化物在牙膏等口腔卫生产品中的全球使用,这一评估将具有高度相关性。为了更深入地了解这些说法,我们回顾了人类暴露水平,以及动物实验的结果,特别是重点关注发育毒性以及氟化物可能产生不良影响的分子机制。此外,还分析了研究氟化物对神经元细胞和前体细胞/干细胞影响的体外研究,并考虑了自 2012 年以来发表的 23 项流行病学研究。结果表明,动物研究中无观察到不良效应水平(NOAEL)与人类当前氟化物适宜摄入量(AI)(50μg/kgbw/天)之间的暴露边际(MOE)范围在 50 到 210 之间,具体取决于用作参考的特定动物实验。即使对于氟化物暴露水平异常高的情况,也获得了至少 10 的 MOE。此外,人类血浆中的氟化物浓度远低于在细胞培养中引起效应的浓度。相比之下,23 项最近的流行病学研究中有 21 项报告了高氟化物暴露与智力降低之间存在关联。实验证据和流行病学证据之间的差异可能可以通过对氟化物和智力之间假定关联的大多数这些流行病学研究中固有的缺陷来调和,特别是充分考虑到潜在的混杂因素,例如社会经济地位、住所、母乳喂养、低出生体重、母亲智力和接触其他神经毒性化学物质。总之,基于目前可用的科学证据的总体情况,本综述不支持假定氟化物应在欧洲目前的暴露水平下被评估为人类发育神经毒物。