Department of Periodontology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Surgery, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Periodontol 2000. 2020 Jun;83(1):154-174. doi: 10.1111/prd.12294.
Periodontal diseases are considered not only to affect tooth-supporting tissues but also to have a cause-and-effect relationship with various systemic diseases and conditions, such as adverse pregnancy outcomes. Mechanistic studies provide strong evidence that periodontal pathogens can translocate from infected periodontium to the feto-placental unit and initiate a metastatic infection. However, the extent and mechanisms by which metastatic inflammation and injury contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes still remain unclear. The presence of oral bacteria in the placenta of women with term gestation further complicates our understanding of the biology behind the role of periodontal pathogens in pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiological studies demonstrate many methodological inconsistencies and flaws that render comparisons difficult and conclusions insecure. Therefore, despite the fact that a number of prospective studies show a positive association between periodontal diseases and various adverse pregnancy outcomes, the evidence behind it is still weak. Future well-designed explanatory studies are necessary to verify this relationship and, if present, determine its magnitude. The majority of high-quality randomized controlled trials reveal that nonsurgical periodontal therapy during the second trimester of gestation does not improve pregnancy outcomes. From a biological standpoint, this can be partially explained by the fact that therapy rendered at the fourth to sixth months of pregnancy is too late to prevent placental colonization by periodontal pathogens and consequently incapable of affecting pathogen-induced injury at the feto-placental unit. Thus, interventions during the preconception period may be more meaningful. With the increase in our understanding on the potential association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes, it is clear that dental practitioners should provide periodontal treatment to pregnant women that is safe for both the mother and the unborn child. Although there is not enough evidence that the anti-infective therapy alters pregnancy outcomes, it improves health-promoting behavior and periodontal condition, which in turn advance general health and risk factor control.
牙周病不仅被认为会影响牙齿支持组织,还与各种系统性疾病和病症(如不良妊娠结局)有因果关系。机制研究提供了强有力的证据,表明牙周病原体可以从感染的牙周组织转移到胎-胎盘单位,并引发转移性感染。然而,转移性炎症和损伤对不良妊娠结局的影响程度和机制仍不清楚。在足月妊娠妇女的胎盘中有口腔细菌存在,这进一步使我们对牙周病原体在妊娠结局中作用背后的生物学机制难以理解。流行病学研究表明,许多方法学上的不一致和缺陷使得比较困难,结论不可靠。因此,尽管一些前瞻性研究表明牙周病与各种不良妊娠结局之间存在正相关关系,但背后的证据仍然很薄弱。未来需要进行精心设计的解释性研究来验证这种关系,如果存在,还需要确定其程度。大多数高质量的随机对照试验表明,妊娠中期进行非手术牙周治疗并不能改善妊娠结局。从生物学角度来看,这部分可以解释为,在妊娠第四个月到第六个月进行治疗为时已晚,无法防止牙周病原体对胎盘的定植,因此无法影响胎-胎盘单位的病原体诱导损伤。因此,在受孕前进行干预可能更有意义。随着我们对牙周病与不良妊娠结局之间潜在关联的理解的增加,很明显,牙科医生应该为孕妇提供既对母亲又对胎儿安全的牙周治疗。虽然没有足够的证据表明抗感染治疗会改变妊娠结局,但它可以改善促进健康的行为和牙周状况,从而促进整体健康和危险因素控制。