• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine.人类对药物急性反应的稳定性在多次测试中的表现:酒精和安非他命的研究结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107989. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107989. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
2
Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.主观反应预测健康志愿者对安非他命的选择。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 May;204:173158. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers.情绪特质可预测健康志愿者中安非他命诱发的积极情绪的个体差异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan;233(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4091-y. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
4
Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study.乙醇和右旋苯丙胺反应的个体差异:一项受试者内研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Apr;25(4):540-8.
5
Stress-induced changes in mood and cortisol release predict mood effects of amphetamine.压力引起的情绪变化和皮质醇释放可预测安非他命对情绪的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.029. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
6
Acute drug effects on habitual and non-habitual responding in crossed high alcohol preferring mice.急性药物对交叉高酒精偏好小鼠习惯性和非习惯性反应的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jul;235(7):2167-2175. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4914-8. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Rewarding effects of physical activity predict sensitivity to the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in healthy volunteers.体育活动的奖励效应预测健康志愿者对安非他命急性主观效应的敏感性。
J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Mar;32(3):302-308. doi: 10.1177/0269881117748901. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Contextual conditioning enhances the psychostimulant and incentive properties of d-amphetamine in humans.语境条件作用增强了人类体内 d-苯丙胺的精神兴奋剂和激励特性。
Addict Biol. 2013 Nov;18(6):985-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00416.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
A Preliminary Investigation of Individual Differences in Subjective Responses to D-Amphetamine, Alcohol, and Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Using a Within-Subjects Randomized Trial.使用受试者内随机试验对D-苯丙胺、酒精和Δ-9-四氢大麻酚主观反应的个体差异进行的初步调查。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 29;10(10):e0140501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140501. eCollection 2015.
10
Caffeine choice prospectively predicts positive subjective effects of caffeine and d-amphetamine.咖啡因的选择可以预测咖啡因和 d-苯丙胺的积极主观影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Nov 1;118(2-3):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.04.018. Epub 2011 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of inhibitory control are associated with stimulant-like effects of alcohol.抑制控制的神经相关性与酒精的类兴奋剂效应有关。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jul;46(8):1442-1450. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01014-5. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.主观反应预测健康志愿者对安非他命的选择。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 May;204:173158. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Subjective Effects of Alcohol Predict Alcohol Choice in Social Drinkers.主观酒精效应预测社交饮酒者的酒精选择。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Dec;44(12):2579-2587. doi: 10.1111/acer.14476. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Poor inhibitory control is associated with greater stimulation and less sedation following alcohol.酒精摄入后,抑制控制能力较差与刺激增加和镇静减少有关。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Mar;237(3):825-832. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05420-y. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
2
Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity.对金钱奖励的神经激活与安非他命的奖励敏感性有关。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jul;43(8):1738-1744. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0042-8. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
Test-retest reliability of the underlying latent factor structure of alcohol subjective response.酒精主观反应潜在因子结构的重测信度。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Apr;234(8):1209-1216. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4535-7. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder.对进展为酒精使用障碍的重度饮酒者酒精反应进行的为期5年的前瞻性重新检查。
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 15;79(6):489-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Reproducibility of post-amphetamine [11C]FLB 457 binding to cortical D2/3 receptors.安非他命 [11C]FLB 457 与皮质 D2/3 受体结合的可重复性。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e76905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076905. eCollection 2013.
6
Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.人格与人类服用 d-苯丙胺后的急性主观效应。
J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;27(3):256-64. doi: 10.1177/0269881112472564. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
7
Contextual conditioning enhances the psychostimulant and incentive properties of d-amphetamine in humans.语境条件作用增强了人类体内 d-苯丙胺的精神兴奋剂和激励特性。
Addict Biol. 2013 Nov;18(6):985-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00416.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
8
Modeling sensitization to stimulants in humans: an [11C]raclopride/positron emission tomography study in healthy men.人类对兴奋剂的致敏作用建模:一项针对健康男性的[11C]雷氯必利/正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;63(12):1386-95. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1386.
9
Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者的人格与急性苯丙胺的主观效应
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 May;31(5):1064-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300939.
10
Variations in affect following amphetamine and placebo: markers of stimulant drug preference.服用安非他明和安慰剂后情感的变化:兴奋剂药物偏好的指标。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Feb;11(1):91-101. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.11.1.91.

人类对药物急性反应的稳定性在多次测试中的表现:酒精和安非他命的研究结果。

Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107989. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107989. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107989
PMID:32386922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7354676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controlled drug challenge studies provide valuable information about the acute behavioral effects of drugs, including individual differences that may affect risk for abuse. One question that arises in such studies is whether a single administration of a drug (and placebo) provides an accurate measure of response to the drug.

METHODS

Here, we examined data from two studies, one with alcohol and one with amphetamine, in which participants received two administrations of the drug and placebo. In this analysis we assess the stability of acute subjective and cardiovascular responses to the drugs across the two administrations. We examine i) systematic increases or decreases to the drugs from the first to the second administration, ii) test-retest reliability within individuals and iii) the accuracy of the acute drug responses to predict drug choice in a later session.

RESULTS

Responses were largely stable across sessions, although on the second session amphetamine "liking" was higher, and subjective responses to placebo including "liking" and "want more" decreased in both studies. Test-retest reliability within individuals was high. Responses during the first drug administration were as accurate in predicting drug choice as responses during both administrations combined.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that a single administration of drug (and placebo) provides a good index of an individual's responses to alcohol or amphetamine, when participants are tested under controlled experimental conditions.

摘要

背景

药物控制挑战研究提供了有关药物急性行为效应的有价值信息,包括可能影响滥用风险的个体差异。在这样的研究中出现的一个问题是,单次给药(和安慰剂)是否能准确衡量对药物的反应。

方法

在这里,我们检查了来自两项研究的数据,一项是酒精,一项是安非他命,参与者接受了两次药物和安慰剂的给药。在这项分析中,我们评估了药物急性主观和心血管反应在两次给药之间的稳定性。我们检查了:i)从第一次给药到第二次给药,药物的系统增加或减少,ii)个体内的测试-重测可靠性,以及 iii)急性药物反应预测随后的药物选择的准确性。

结果

反应在各次试验中基本稳定,尽管在第二次试验中,安非他命的“喜欢”程度更高,而在两项研究中,包括“喜欢”和“想要更多”的安慰剂主观反应都有所下降。个体内的测试-重测可靠性很高。在第一次药物给药期间的反应与两次给药期间的反应一样准确,可以预测药物选择。

结论

我们的发现表明,在受控实验条件下,当参与者接受测试时,单次给药(和安慰剂)可很好地反映个体对酒精或安非他命的反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/f9fec06cdcbb/nihms-1593949-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/f101d0b90a1d/nihms-1593949-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/55ff511fb384/nihms-1593949-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/65f245cb3f6d/nihms-1593949-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/f9fec06cdcbb/nihms-1593949-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/f101d0b90a1d/nihms-1593949-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/55ff511fb384/nihms-1593949-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/65f245cb3f6d/nihms-1593949-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd0/7354676/f9fec06cdcbb/nihms-1593949-f0004.jpg