• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种新的体外防晒因子方法,以涵盖广泛的防晒产品乳液类型。

Validation of a new in vitro Sun Protection Factor method to include a wide range of sunscreen product emulsion types.

机构信息

Coty-Lancaster SAM, 2, rue de la Lujerneta, Monaco, 98000, Monaco.

L'Oréal, 188 rue Paul Hochart, Chevilly Larue, 94550, France.

出版信息

Int J Cosmet Sci. 2020 Oct;42(5):421-428. doi: 10.1111/ics.12625. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/ics.12625
PMID:32390187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246923/
Abstract

In 2017, Cosmetics Europe performed a double-blinded ring test of 24 emulsion-type sunscreen products, across 3 in vivo test laboratories and 3 in vitro test laboratories, using a new candidate in vitro SPF test method. Based on the results of this work, an article was published showing how data derived from a new lead candidate method conform to new International Standards (ISO) acceptance criteria for alternative SPF test methods (Any alternative method should consider the matrix effect and if required, specify the matrix applicability of the method; Criterion 1a: Systematic differences between methods should be negligible: 95% of all individual results of an alternative method are within the range of ±2× reproducibility standard deviation of the in vivo method, that is overall bias must be below 0.5× reproducibility standard deviation of the in vivo method; Criterion 1b: Measurement uncertainty of an alternative method should be below the measurement uncertainty of the in vivo method. Candidate method predicted values must fall within the full 'funnel' (SPF 6-50+) limits proposed by Cosmetics Europe (derived from the same minimum test design, that is using the ISO24444 Method to measure at least 24 products across at least 3 laboratories using at least 5 test subjects/laboratory, in a blinded fashion).). Of the 24 sunscreen products tested, the majority of emulsions were of the oil-in-water (O/W) type, whereas only one was water-in-oil (W/O) and there were no products with a mineral-only sun filter system. In order to confirm the scope of this method, therefore, a new study was conducted that included 73 W/O (12 mineral + organic, 44 mineral only and 17 organic only) and 3 O/W mineral-only, emulsion-type sunscreen products (a total of 76 new sunscreen products). When combined with the previous 24 products (tested in 3 different laboratories), this yielded a new data set comprising a total of 100 emulsion-type sunscreen products, with SPF values ranging from 6 to 50+ (with a total of 148 data points). These products were tested using the double-plate in vitro SPF test method and compared with the ISO TC217/WG7 acceptance criteria for alternative SPF test methods. Over 95% of paired in vitro: in vivo SPF values lay within the upper and lower limits of the ISO acceptance criteria funnel, with no bias. This new in vitro SPF test method, therefore, meets the minimum requirements for an alternative SPF test method to ISO24444:2010, for emulsion-type sunscreen products (which make up the majority of marketed sunscreen products).

摘要

2017 年,欧洲化妆品协会(Cosmetics Europe)针对 24 种乳液型防晒产品进行了双盲环试验,试验分别在 3 个体内测试实验室和 3 个体外测试实验室中进行,采用了一种新的候选体外 SPF 测试方法。基于这项工作的结果,发表了一篇文章,展示了如何根据新的国际标准(ISO)接受标准,将新的主导候选方法的数据转化为替代 SPF 测试方法(任何替代方法都应考虑基质效应,如果需要,指定方法的基质适用性;标准 1a:方法之间的系统差异应可忽略不计:替代方法的 95%个体结果应在体内方法的重复性标准差的±2×范围内,即整体偏差必须低于体内方法的重复性标准差的 0.5×;标准 1b:替代方法的测量不确定度应低于体内方法的测量不确定度。候选方法的预测值必须落在欧洲化妆品协会(Cosmetics Europe)提出的完整“漏斗”(SPF 6-50+)范围内(源自相同的最小测试设计,即使用 ISO24444 方法在至少 3 个实验室中对至少 24 种产品进行测量,每个实验室使用至少 5 个测试对象,采用双盲方式))。在所测试的 24 种防晒产品中,大多数乳液为油包水(O/W)型,而仅有 1 种为水包油(W/O)型,且没有仅含矿物质的防晒产品。因此,为了确认该方法的范围,进行了一项新的研究,其中包括 73 种 W/O(12 种矿物质+有机,44 种仅含矿物质和 17 种仅含有机)和 3 种 O/W 仅含矿物质的乳液型防晒产品(共 76 种新的防晒产品)。将这些产品与之前的 24 种产品(在 3 个不同的实验室中进行测试)相结合,产生了一个新的数据集,其中包括总共 100 种乳液型防晒产品,SPF 值范围从 6 到 50+(共 148 个数据点)。这些产品使用双板体外 SPF 测试方法进行了测试,并与 ISO TC217/WG7 替代 SPF 测试方法的接受标准进行了比较。超过 95%的体外:体内 SPF 值落在 ISO 接受标准漏斗的上限和下限内,没有偏差。因此,这种新的体外 SPF 测试方法符合 ISO24444:2010 中针对乳液型防晒产品(占市场上防晒产品的大部分)的替代 SPF 测试方法的最低要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/84d9bb413552/ICS-42-421-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/677ac8e173ad/ICS-42-421-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/6dff43542e41/ICS-42-421-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/bbbf13549af2/ICS-42-421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/472e38610c36/ICS-42-421-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/0d55fbea2c0c/ICS-42-421-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/84d9bb413552/ICS-42-421-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/677ac8e173ad/ICS-42-421-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/6dff43542e41/ICS-42-421-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/bbbf13549af2/ICS-42-421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/472e38610c36/ICS-42-421-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/0d55fbea2c0c/ICS-42-421-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f422/8246923/84d9bb413552/ICS-42-421-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a new in vitro Sun Protection Factor method to include a wide range of sunscreen product emulsion types.验证一种新的体外防晒因子方法,以涵盖广泛的防晒产品乳液类型。
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2020 Oct;42(5):421-428. doi: 10.1111/ics.12625. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Validation of an in vitro sun protection factor (SPF) method in blinded ring-testing.体外防晒系数(SPF)方法在双盲环形试验中的验证
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018 Apr 20. doi: 10.1111/ics.12459.
3
Multi-laboratory study of hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to assess sunscreen SPF and UVA-PFs.多实验室研究混合漫反射光谱法评估防晒霜的 SPF 和 UVA-PF 值。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2021 Nov;37(6):511-520. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12703. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal in vivo Testing of Sun Protection Factor.混合漫反射光谱法:防晒因子的非红斑活体测试。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2018;31(4):220-228. doi: 10.1159/000488249. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
New noninvasive approach assessing in vivo sun protection factor (SPF) using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and in vitro transmission.一种使用漫反射光谱法(DRS)和体外透光度评估体内防晒系数(SPF)的新型非侵入性方法。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014 Aug;30(4):202-11. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12105. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
6
Reliable and simple spectrophotometric determination of sun protection factor: A case study using organic UV filter-based sunscreen products.可靠且简便的防晒系数分光光度测定法:以基于有机紫外线过滤剂的防晒产品为例的研究
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Jun;17(3):518-522. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12390. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
7
New approach for a reliable in vitro sun protection factor method - Part II: Practical aspects and implementations.一种可靠的体外防晒系数方法的新途径——第二部分:实际应用与实施
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Oct;38(5):504-11. doi: 10.1111/ics.12327. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
HDRS - Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal In Vivo Driven SPF and UVA-PF Testing.HDRS-混合漫反射光谱法:非红斑活体驱动的 SPF 和 UVA-PF 测试。
Curr Probl Dermatol. 2021;55:144-156. doi: 10.1159/000517664. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
Sunscreen sun protection factor claim based on in vivo interlaboratory variability.基于实验室间体内变异性的防晒霜防晒系数声明。
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Dec;38(6):541-549. doi: 10.1111/ics.12333. Epub 2016 May 18.
10
The 'Dispersal Rate' - a product dependent characteristic to predict the reliability of the calibrated in vitro SPF on WW5 plates.“扩散率”——一种取决于产品的特性,用于预测在WW5平板上校准的体外防晒系数(SPF)的可靠性。
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Jun;38(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/ics.12293. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Sun-protection factor of zinc-oxide sunscreens: SPF too low compared to SPF-a brief review.氧化锌防晒霜的防晒因子:与防晒因子相比,防晒因子过低——简要回顾。
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2024 Oct;23(10):1999-2009. doi: 10.1007/s43630-024-00644-0. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Innovative snail-mucus-extract (SME)-coated nanoparticles exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects for potential skin cancer prevention and treatment.创新的蜗牛黏液提取物(SME)包被纳米颗粒具有抗炎和抗增殖作用,可用于潜在的皮肤癌预防和治疗。
RSC Adv. 2024 Mar 4;14(11):7655-7663. doi: 10.1039/d4ra00291a. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
3
[Characterization of sun protection performance: Quo vadis?].

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of an in vitro sun protection factor (SPF) method in blinded ring-testing.体外防晒系数(SPF)方法在双盲环形试验中的验证
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018 Apr 20. doi: 10.1111/ics.12459.
2
New approach for a reliable in vitro sun protection factor method - Part II: Practical aspects and implementations.一种可靠的体外防晒系数方法的新途径——第二部分:实际应用与实施
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Oct;38(5):504-11. doi: 10.1111/ics.12327. Epub 2016 May 6.
3
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
[防晒性能的表征:何去何从?]
Hautarzt. 2022 Apr;73(4):276-282. doi: 10.1007/s00105-022-04958-x. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Laboratory testing of sunscreens on the US market finds lower in vitro SPF values than on labels and even less UVA protection.美国市场上防晒霜的实验室测试发现,其体外 SPF 值低于标签值,甚至对 UVA 的防护也更少。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022 May;38(3):224-232. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12738. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
4
New approach for a reliable in vitro sun protection factor method Part I: Principle and mathematical aspects.一种可靠的体外防晒系数方法的新途径 第一部分:原理与数学方面
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2015 Dec;37(6):555-66. doi: 10.1111/ics.12226. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice.布兰德-奥特曼图在方法比较研究解释中的应用:对其实践的批判性考察。
Clin Chem. 2002 May;48(5):799-801; author reply 801-2.
6
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.方法比较研究中的一致性测量
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
7
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.