Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 52, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 21;13(1):4613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31752-z.
Prioritized processing of fearful compared to neutral faces is reflected in increased amplitudes of components of the event-related potential (ERP). It is unknown whether specific face parts drive these modulations. Here, we investigated the contributions of face parts on ERPs to task-irrelevant fearful and neutral faces using an ERP-dependent facial decoding technique and a large sample of participants (N = 83). Classical ERP analyses showed typical and robust increases of N170 and EPN amplitudes by fearful relative to neutral faces. Facial decoding further showed that the absolute amplitude of these components, as well as the P1, was driven by the low-frequency contrast of specific face parts. However, the difference between fearful and neutral faces was not driven by any specific face part, as supported by Bayesian statistics. Furthermore, there were no correlations between trait anxiety and main effects or interactions. These results suggest that increased N170 and EPN amplitudes to task-irrelevant fearful compared to neutral faces are not driven by specific facial regions but represent a holistic face processing effect.
与中性面孔相比,对恐惧面孔的优先处理反映在事件相关电位(ERP)成分的振幅增加上。目前尚不清楚是否是特定的面部部位驱动了这些调制。在这里,我们使用基于 ERP 的面部解码技术和大量参与者(N=83)研究了面部部位对面部无关恐惧和中性面孔的 ERP 的贡献。经典的 ERP 分析表明,与中性面孔相比,恐惧面孔会引起 N170 和 EPN 振幅的典型且强烈的增加。面部解码进一步表明,这些成分的绝对振幅,以及 P1,是由特定面部部位的低频对比度驱动的。然而,贝叶斯统计支持的是,恐惧与中性面孔之间的差异并不是由任何特定的面部部位驱动的。此外,特质焦虑与主要效应或交互作用之间没有相关性。这些结果表明,与中性面孔相比,对任务无关的恐惧面孔的 N170 和 EPN 振幅增加不是由特定的面部区域驱动的,而是代表整体的面部处理效应。