Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Galen-Orthopaedics, 43-150 Bierun, ul Jerzego 6, Poland.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 May 1;19(2):317-322. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Scientific studies related to resistance training have considered many variables; however, the tempo of movement of particular repetitions is often neglected or not reported in resistance training practice and research. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of different duration of the eccentric (ECC) phase of movement on one-repetition maximum test (1RM) results during the bench press exercise (BP). Twenty-one strength trained females (age = 23.4 ± 2.2 years, body mass = 52.3 ± 6.7 kg), with a minimum one year of strength training experience took part in the study. The experiment was conducted following a randomized crossover design, where each participant completed the 1RM test in the BP with three different duration times of the ECC movement: 2/0/X, 4/0/X, 6/0/X. Concentric (CON) movement was performed with maximal velocity (X). The ANOVA with repeated measures were used to compare the differences between the analyzed variables. The results of the study indicated the maximal load in the 1RM test was significantly higher during the BP with the 2/0/X tempo compared to 6/0/X (p < 0.01) and 4/0/X tempos (p < 0.01). Therefore, the results indicated that the longer the duration of the ECC phase of movement, the greater the decrease in the result of the 1RM test. The 1RM test procedure should include information about the movement tempo used during the test protocol.
科学研究已经考虑到了许多与抗阻训练相关的变量;然而,在抗阻训练实践和研究中,往往忽略或不报告特定重复的运动节奏。本研究的目的是确定在卧推运动中,不同的离心(ECC)阶段运动持续时间对 1 次重复最大测试(1RM)结果的影响。21 名有力量训练经验的女性(年龄=23.4±2.2 岁,体重=52.3±6.7 公斤)参与了这项研究。实验采用随机交叉设计进行,每位参与者在卧推中完成 3 种不同的 ECC 运动持续时间的 1RM 测试:2/0/X、4/0/X、6/0/X。进行向心(CON)运动时,速度达到最大值(X)。采用重复测量方差分析比较分析变量之间的差异。研究结果表明,与 6/0/X(p<0.01)和 4/0/X 时相比,在 2/0/X 时的 1RM 测试中最大负荷明显更高。因此,结果表明,ECC 阶段运动持续时间越长,1RM 测试的结果下降越大。1RM 测试程序应包括测试协议中使用的运动节奏信息。