Suppr超能文献

运动节奏对卧推单次最大重量成绩的影响。

The Effects of the Movement Tempo on the One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press Results.

作者信息

Wilk Michal, Golas Artur, Zmijewski Piotr, Krzysztofik Michal, Filip Aleksandra, Coso Juan Del, Tufano James J

机构信息

Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice Poland.

Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2020 Mar 31;72:151-159. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0001. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Different tempos of movement can be used during resistance training, but programming them is often a trial-and-error practice, as changing the speed at which the exercise is performed does not always correspond with the tempo at which the 1-repetition-maximum occurred. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of different movement tempos during the bench press (BP) exercise on the one-repetition maximum (1RM) load. Ninety men (age = 25.8 ± 5.3 years, body mass = 80.2 ± 14.9 kg), with a minimum one year of resistance training experience took part in the study. Using a randomized crossover design, each participant completed the BP 1RM test with five different movement tempos: V/0/V/0, 2/0/V/0, 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0. Repeated measures ANOVA compared the differences between the 1RM at each tempo. The 1RM load was significantly greater during V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 compared to 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0, and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the 1RM load was significantly greater during 5/0/V/0 compared to 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01), but there were no differences between either V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 (p = 0.92) or between 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p = 0.08). Therefore, different movement tempos used during training should be accompanied by their own tempo-specific 1RM testing, as slower eccentric phases significantly decrease maximal concentric performance. Furthermore, 1RM test procedures should include information about the movement tempo used during the test protocol. In addition, the standardization of the tempo should be taken into account in investigations that use the 1 RM test to assess the effects of any treatment on maximal muscle strength.

摘要

在阻力训练中可以使用不同的运动节奏,但对其进行规划往往是一种反复试验的做法,因为改变运动执行速度并不总是与单次重复最大值出现时的节奏相对应。因此,本研究的目的是确定卧推(BP)运动中不同运动节奏对单次重复最大值(1RM)负荷的影响。九十名男性(年龄 = 25.8 ± 5.3岁,体重 = 80.2 ± 14.9千克)参与了该研究,他们至少有一年的阻力训练经验。采用随机交叉设计,每位参与者以五种不同的运动节奏完成卧推1RM测试:V/0/V/0、2/0/V/0、5/0/V/0、8/0/V/0和10/0/V/0。重复测量方差分析比较了每种节奏下1RM之间的差异。与5/0/V/0、8/0/V/0和10/0/V/0相比,V/0/V/0和2/0/V/0期间的1RM负荷显著更大(p < 0.01)。此外,与8/0/V/0和10/0/V/0相比,5/0/V/0期间的1RM负荷显著更大(p < 0.01),但V/0/V/0和2/0/V/0之间(p = 0.92)或8/0/V/0和10/0/V/0之间(p = 0.08)均无差异。因此,训练中使用的不同运动节奏应伴随其特定节奏的1RM测试,因为较慢的离心阶段会显著降低最大向心表现。此外,1RM测试程序应包括有关测试方案中使用的运动节奏的信息。此外,在使用1RM测试评估任何治疗对最大肌肉力量影响的研究中,应考虑节奏的标准化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d2f/7126254/0bd82f488238/hukin-72-151-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验