Dong Yang, Tang Yi, Wu Sammy Xiao-Ying, Dong Wei-Yang, Li Zhen
Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, China.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 24;11:702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00702. eCollection 2020.
This longitudinal study investigated how different mediums of word explanation affected the use of English vocabulary strategies among Chinese Grade-7 students. 170 students were tested on their English receptive vocabulary size and vocabulary strategy application before and after an 8.33-month intervention. Students were divided into three experimental groups and one control group. The three experimental groups were provided with learning materials that explained the target vocabulary in three mediums, respectively: English-only, English-and-Chinese, and Chinese-only. Results showed that, after the intervention, receptive vocabulary size did not have any direct significant impact on vocabulary strategy development, whereas mediums of word explanation materials impacted students' application of vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) in different ways. Our findings showed that the English-only mediums significantly enhanced students' use of metacognition, cognition, and memorization strategies, but decreased social strategy development. Chinese-only mediums significantly facilitated cognition and memorization strategy development. Implications for L2 vocabulary education are discussed.
这项纵向研究调查了不同的单词解释媒介如何影响中国七年级学生英语词汇策略的使用。在为期8.33个月的干预前后,对170名学生的英语接受性词汇量和词汇策略应用进行了测试。学生被分为三个实验组和一个对照组。三个实验组分别被提供了用三种媒介解释目标词汇的学习材料:仅用英语、英汉双语、仅用中文。结果表明,干预后,接受性词汇量对词汇策略发展没有直接的显著影响,而单词解释材料的媒介以不同方式影响学生词汇学习策略(VLS)的应用。我们的研究结果表明,仅用英语的媒介显著增强了学生对元认知、认知和记忆策略的使用,但减少了社交策略的发展。仅用中文的媒介显著促进了认知和记忆策略的发展。文中讨论了对第二语言词汇教育的启示。