School of Languages, Literatures and Linguistics, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Institute of English Studies, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236798. eCollection 2020.
This study compares how lexical inferencing and dictionary consultation affect L2 vocabulary acquisition. Sixty-one L1 Arabic undergraduates majoring in English language read target words in semi-authentic English reading materials and were either asked to guess their meaning or look it up in a dictionary. A pre- and delayed post-test measured participants' knowledge of target words and overall vocabulary size. The results show a significant and comparable learning effect for both vocabulary learning strategies (VLS), with a higher pre-test vocabulary size related to a larger learning effect for both VLS. In addition, the better participants were at guessing correctly, the better they learned words through inferencing. The results suggest that both VLS are equally effective for our learner group and that learners' overall vocabulary size influences the amount of learning that occurs when using these VLS.
本研究比较了词汇推断和词典查询这两种策略对二语词汇习得的影响。61 名以英语为母语、主修阿拉伯语的本科生阅读半真实英语阅读材料中的目标单词,然后被要求猜测其含义或在词典中查找。在预测试和延迟后测试中,衡量了参与者对目标单词的知识和整体词汇量。结果表明,这两种词汇学习策略(VLS)都有显著且相当的学习效果,较高的预测试词汇量与两种 VLS 的更大学习效果相关。此外,参与者猜对的能力越强,通过推断学习单词的效果就越好。结果表明,这两种 VLS 对我们的学习者群体同样有效,并且学习者的整体词汇量会影响使用这些 VLS 时的学习量。