Zhang Lijin, Wu Bin, Zha Zhenlei, Zhao Hu, Yuan Jun, Feng Yejun
Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 22;10:487. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00487. eCollection 2020.
Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81-1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, < 0.001), carcinoma (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU.
尽管已有报道指出淋巴管侵犯(LVI)对上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)具有预后价值,但对于根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)后UTUC中LVI的预后因素仍缺乏共识。本研究的目的是通过系统评价和荟萃分析来评估LVI的当代作用。我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,对科学网、PubMed和EMBASE进行了系统检索,以查找截至2019年7月发表的所有报告。对风险比(HRs)/比值比(ORs)及其相应的95%置信区间进行累积分析,以评估LVI与肿瘤学结局及临床病理特征之间的关联。我们的荟萃分析纳入了31项符合条件的研究,共14,653例UTUC患者(每项研究81 - 1,363例)。我们的结果表明,LVI与较差的癌症特异性生存(HR = 1.59,P < 0.001)、总生存(HR = 1.55,P < 0.001)、无复发生存(HR = 1.46,P < 0.001)、癌症特异性死亡(HR = 1.25,P = 0.047)和复发(HR = 1.23,P = 0.026)显著相关。LVI还与晚期肿瘤分期(III/IV期 vs. I/II期:OR = 7.63,P < 0.001)、较高肿瘤分级(3级 vs. 1/2级:OR = 5.61,P < 0.001)、淋巴结转移(有 vs. 无:OR = 4.95,P < 0.001)、肾盂癌(有 vs. 无:OR = 1.92,P < 0.001)及手术切缘阳性(有 vs. 无:OR = 4.38,P < 0.001)相关,但与性别(男性 vs. 女性:OR = 0.98,P = 0.825)和多灶性(多灶性 vs. 单灶性:OR = 1.09,P = 0.555)无关。漏斗图检验表明无显著的发表偏倚。本研究表明,LVI与侵袭性临床病理特征相关。LVI可能是RNU后UTUC患者的不良预后因素。