Garoushi S, Tanner J, Keulemans F, Le Bell-Rönnlöf A-M, Lassila L, Vallittu P K
Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center -TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020 May 28;28(2):54-63. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2002Garoushi10.
The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT), even though practiced for many years, remains a major concern in dentistry. There is a variety of materials and clinical techniques advocated for restoring ETT and hundreds of studies devoted to this subject have been published in the dental literature. This narrative review article was undertaken to answer a question regarding restoration of ETT with available evidence: What fiber reinforcement options do we have other than prefabricated fiber post? Using a Medline search (up to 2019) and resulting cross-references, authors selected original research on the topic of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) and restoration of ETT. Of the assessed articles selected (n=79), most were laboratory-based research with various test specimen designs and only 15 articles were clinical reports. From the reviewed studies, using individually formed FRC posts and short-FRC resin showed promising characteristics, and therefore, might be recommended as an alternative treatment option in restoring ETT. However, long-term clinical trials are needed in order to evaluate the usefulness of these alternatives.
尽管牙髓治疗牙齿(ETT)的修复已开展多年,但仍是牙科领域的一个主要关注点。有多种材料和临床技术被提倡用于修复ETT,并且牙科文献中已发表了数百项致力于该主题的研究。这篇叙述性综述文章旨在利用现有证据回答一个关于ETT修复的问题:除了预制纤维桩之外,我们还有哪些纤维增强选项?通过医学文献数据库(Medline)检索(截至2019年)及由此产生的交叉参考文献,作者选择了关于纤维增强复合材料(FRC)和ETT修复主题的原始研究。在所评估的选定文章(n = 79)中,大多数是基于实验室的研究,具有各种测试样本设计,只有15篇文章是临床报告。从综述研究来看,使用单独成型的FRC桩和短FRC树脂显示出有前景的特性,因此,在修复ETT时可能被推荐作为一种替代治疗选择。然而,需要进行长期临床试验以评估这些替代方法的有效性。