Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Neuroimaging. 2020 Jul;30(4):428-442. doi: 10.1111/jon.12719. Epub 2020 May 11.
The purpose of this systematic review is to identify trends and extent of variability in intracranial vessel wall MR imaging (VWI) techniques and protocols. Although variability in selection of protocol design and pulse sequence type is known, data on what and how protocols vary are unknown. Three databases were searched to identify publications using intracranial VWI. Publications were screened by predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Technical development publications were scored for completeness of reporting using a modified Nature Reporting Summary Guideline to assess reproducibility. From 2,431 articles, 122 met the inclusion criteria. Trends over the last 23 years (1995-2018) show increased use of 3-Tesla MR (P < .001) and 3D volumetric T1-weighted acquisitions (P < .001). Most (65%) clinical VWI publications report achieving a noninterpolated in-plane spatial resolution of ≤.55 mm. In the last decade, an increasing number of technical development (n = 20) and 7 Tesla (n = 12) publications have been published, focused on pulse sequence development, improving cerebrospinal fluid suppression, scan efficiency, and imaging ex vivo specimen for histologic validation. Mean Reporting Summary Score for the technical development publications was high (.87, range: .63-1.0) indicating strong scientific technical reproducibility. Innovative work continues to emerge to address implementation challenges. Gradual adoption into the research and scientific community was suggested by a shift in the name in the literature from "high-resolution MR" to "vessel wall imaging," specifying diagnostic intent. Insight into current practices and identifying the extent of technical variability in the literature will help to direct future clinical and technical efforts to address needs for implementation.
本系统评价的目的是确定颅内血管壁磁共振成像(VWI)技术和方案的变化趋势和程度。虽然已知协议设计和脉冲序列类型的选择存在差异,但有关协议变化的内容和方式的数据尚不清楚。我们检索了三个数据库以确定使用颅内 VWI 的出版物。通过预定的纳入/排除标准筛选出版物。使用经过修改的 Nature 报告摘要指南对技术开发出版物进行评分,以评估其报告的完整性,从而评估其可重复性。从 2431 篇文章中,有 122 篇符合纳入标准。过去 23 年(1995-2018 年)的趋势表明,3 特斯拉磁共振(P<.001)和 3D 容积 T1 加权采集的使用有所增加(P<.001)。大多数(65%)临床 VWI 出版物报告实现了非插值的平面内空间分辨率≤0.55 毫米。在过去十年中,越来越多的技术开发(n=20)和 7 特斯拉(n=12)出版物发表,重点是脉冲序列开发、改善脑脊液抑制、扫描效率以及对离体标本进行成像以进行组织学验证。技术开发出版物的平均报告摘要评分较高(0.87,范围:0.63-1.0),表明具有很强的科学技术可重复性。为解决实施挑战,创新性工作不断涌现。文献中名称从“高分辨率磁共振”到“血管壁成像”的转变表明了诊断意图,这表明研究和科学界逐渐开始采用。了解当前的实践并确定文献中技术差异的程度将有助于指导未来的临床和技术工作,以满足实施的需求。