Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Molecular Medicine Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 11;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01551-1.
Photo-neutrons are produced at the head of the medical linear accelerators (linac) by the interaction of high-energy photons, and patients receive a whole-body-absorbed dose from these neutrons. The current study aimed to find an efficient shielding material for fast neutrons.
Nanoparticles (NPs) of FeO and BC were applied in a matrix of silicone resin to design a proper shield against fast neutrons produced by the 18 MeV photon beam of a Varian 2100 C/D linac. Neutron macroscopic cross-sections for three types of samples were calculated by the Monte Carlo (MC) method and experimentally measured for neutrons of an Am-Be source. The designed shields in different concentrations were tested by MCNPX MC code, and the proper concentration was chosen for the experimental test. A shield was designed with two layers, including nano-iron oxide and a layer of nano-boron carbide for eliminating fast neutrons.
MC simulation results with uncertainty less than 1% showed that for discrete energies and 50% nanomaterial concentration, the macroscopic cross-sections for iron oxide and boron carbide at the energy of 1 MeV were 0.36 cm and 0.32 cm, respectively. For 30% nanomaterial concentration, the calculated macroscopic cross-sections for iron oxide and boron carbide shields for Am-Be spectrum equaled 0.12 cm and 0.15 cm, respectively, while they are 0.15 cm and 0.18 cm for the linac spectrum. In the experiment with the Am-Be spectrum, the macroscopic cross-sections for 30% nanomaterial concentration were 0.17 ± 0.01 cm for iron oxide and 0.21 ± 0.02 cm for boron carbide. The measured transmission factors for 30% nanomaterial concentration with the Am-Be spectrum were 0.71 ± 0.01, 0.66 ± 0.02, and 0.62 ± 0.01 for the iron oxide, boron carbide, and double-layer shields, respectively. In addition, these values were 0.74, 0.69, and 0.67, respectively, for MC simulation for the linac spectrum at the same concentration and thickness of 2 cm.
Results achieved from MC simulation and experimental tests were in a satisfactory agreement. The difference between MC and measurements was in the range of 10%. Our results demonstrated that the designed double-layer shield has a superior macroscopic cross-section compared with two single-layer nanoshields and more efficiently eliminates fast photo-neutrons.
医学直线加速器(linac)头部的高能光子会产生光中子,患者会受到全身吸收剂量的照射。本研究旨在寻找一种有效的快中子屏蔽材料。
将 FeO 和 BC 纳米颗粒应用于硅树脂基质中,设计一种合适的屏蔽体,以屏蔽由瓦里安 2100 C/D linac 的 18 MeV 光子束产生的快中子。利用蒙特卡罗(MC)方法计算了三种样品的中子宏观截面,并利用 Am-Be 源进行了实验测量。用 MCNPX MC 代码对不同浓度的设计屏蔽体进行了测试,并选择了合适的浓度进行实验测试。设计了一种双层屏蔽体,包括纳米氧化铁和一层纳米碳化硼,以消除快中子。
MC 模拟结果的不确定性小于 1%,表明对于离散能量和 50%纳米材料浓度,在 1 MeV 能量下,氧化铁和碳化硼的宏观截面分别为 0.36 cm 和 0.32 cm。对于 30%纳米材料浓度,计算得到的 Am-Be 能谱下铁氧体和碳化硼屏蔽体的宏观截面分别为 0.12 cm 和 0.15 cm,而 linac 能谱下的宏观截面分别为 0.15 cm 和 0.18 cm。在 Am-Be 能谱的实验中,30%纳米材料浓度下的氧化铁宏观截面为 0.17±0.01 cm,碳化硼的宏观截面为 0.21±0.02 cm。用 Am-Be 能谱测量的 30%纳米材料浓度的透射因子分别为 0.71±0.01、0.66±0.02 和 0.62±0.01,对于铁氧体、碳化硼和双层屏蔽体。此外,在相同浓度和 2 cm 厚度下,MC 模拟的结果分别为 0.74、0.69 和 0.67,用于 linac 能谱。
MC 模拟和实验测试的结果吻合较好。MC 与测量值的差异在 10%范围内。我们的结果表明,设计的双层屏蔽体具有比两个单层纳米屏蔽体更高的宏观截面,能更有效地消除快光中子。