• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保持社区健康研究参与者的参与:标准化规划和报告的案例研究。

Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting.

机构信息

Children's Health Policy Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Room 2431, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 5K3, Canada.

School of Nursing, Faculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 May 11;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04328-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04328-9
PMID:32393334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216482/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective strategies for participant retention are critical in health research to ensure validity, generalizability and efficient use of resources. Yet standardized guidelines for planning and reporting on retention efforts have been lacking. As with randomized controlled trial (RCT) and systematic review (SR) protocols, retention protocols are an opportunity to improve transparency and rigor. An RCT being conducted in British Columbia (BC), Canada provides a case example for developing a priori retention frameworks for use in protocol planning and reporting.

METHODS

The BC Healthy Connections Project RCT is examining the effectiveness of a nurse home-visiting program in improving child and maternal outcomes compared with existing services. Participants (N = 739) were girls and young women preparing to parent for the first time and experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Quantitative data were collected upon trial entry during pregnancy and during five follow-up interviews until participants' children reached age 2 years. A framework was developed to guide retention of this study population throughout the RCT. We reviewed relevant literature and mapped essential retention activities across the study planning, recruitment and maintenance phases. Interview completion rates were tracked.

RESULTS

Results from 3302 follow-up interviews (in-person/telephone) conducted over 4 years indicate high completion rates: 90% (n = 667) at 34 weeks gestation; and 91% (n = 676), 85% (n = 626), 80% (n = 594) and 83% (n = 613) at 2, 10, 18 and 24 months postpartum, respectively. Almost all participants (99%, n = 732) provided ongoing consent to access administrative health data. These results provide preliminary data on the success of the framework.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retention results are encouraging given that participants were experiencing considerable socioeconomic disadvantage. Standardized retention planning and reporting may therefore be feasible for health research in general, using the framework we have developed. Use of standardized retention protocols should be encouraged in research to promote consistency across diverse studies, as now happens with RCT and SR protocols. Beyond this, successful retention approaches may help inform health policy-makers and practitioners who also need to better reach, engage and retain underserved populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01672060. Registered on 24 August 2012.

摘要

背景

在健康研究中,有效的参与者保留策略对于确保有效性、可推广性和资源的有效利用至关重要。然而,缺乏规划和报告保留工作的标准化指南。与随机对照试验(RCT)和系统评价(SR)方案一样,保留方案是提高透明度和严谨性的机会。正在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)进行的一项 RCT 为制定用于方案规划和报告的预先保留框架提供了一个案例研究。

方法

BC 健康连接项目 RCT 正在研究护士家访计划在改善儿童和产妇结局方面的有效性,与现有服务相比。参与者(N=739)是首次准备为人父母且处于社会经济劣势的女孩和年轻女性。在妊娠期间和五次随访访谈期间收集了定量数据,直到参与者的孩子达到 2 岁。制定了一个框架来指导整个 RCT 期间对该研究人群的保留。我们回顾了相关文献,并绘制了研究规划、招募和维持阶段的基本保留活动图。跟踪了访谈完成率。

结果

在 4 年期间进行的 3302 次随访访谈(面对面/电话)的结果表明,完成率很高:妊娠 34 周时为 90%(n=667);产后 2、10、18 和 24 个月时分别为 91%(n=676)、85%(n=626)、80%(n=594)和 83%(n=613)。几乎所有参与者(99%,n=732)都同意继续访问行政健康数据。这些结果提供了该框架成功的初步数据。

结论

鉴于参与者经历了相当大的社会经济劣势,我们的保留结果令人鼓舞。因此,标准化的保留规划和报告对于一般的健康研究可能是可行的,可以使用我们开发的框架。应该鼓励在研究中使用标准化的保留协议,以促进不同研究之间的一致性,就像现在对 RCT 和 SR 协议所做的那样。除此之外,成功的保留方法可能有助于为卫生政策制定者和从业者提供信息,他们也需要更好地接触、参与和保留服务不足的人群。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01672060。于 2012 年 8 月 24 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb37/7216482/6a737e3607c4/13063_2020_4328_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb37/7216482/bd57235f38e6/13063_2020_4328_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb37/7216482/6a737e3607c4/13063_2020_4328_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb37/7216482/bd57235f38e6/13063_2020_4328_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb37/7216482/6a737e3607c4/13063_2020_4328_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting.保持社区健康研究参与者的参与:标准化规划和报告的案例研究。
Trials. 2020 May 11;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04328-9.
2
Improving children's health and development in British Columbia through nurse home visiting: a randomized controlled trial protocol.通过护士家访改善不列颠哥伦比亚省儿童的健康与发展:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 4;16(a):349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1594-0.
3
The British Columbia Healthy Connections Project: findings on socioeconomic disadvantage in early pregnancy.不列颠哥伦比亚省健康连接项目:关于妊娠早期社会经济劣势的研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7479-5.
4
Nurse home visiting and prenatal substance use in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population in British Columbia: analysis of prenatal secondary outcomes in an ongoing randomized controlled trial.不列颠哥伦比亚省社会经济弱势人群中的护士家访与产前物质使用:一项正在进行的随机对照试验中的产前次要结局分析
CMAJ Open. 2020 Oct 27;8(4):E667-E675. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200063. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
5
Effectiveness of nurse-home visiting in improving child and maternal outcomes prenatally to age two years: a randomised controlled trial (British Columbia Healthy Connections Project).护士家访对改善母婴产前至两岁儿童结局的效果:一项随机对照试验(不列颠哥伦比亚省健康连接项目)。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 May;65(5):644-655. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13846. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Effect of Addition of an Intimate Partner Violence Intervention to a Nurse Home Visitation Program on Maternal Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士家访项目中增加亲密伴侣暴力干预对产妇生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 23;321(16):1576-1585. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3211.
7
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
8
The marketing plan and outcome indicators for recruiting and retaining parents in the HomeStyles randomized controlled trial.“家庭风格”随机对照试验中招募和留住家长的营销计划及成果指标。
Trials. 2017 Nov 15;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2262-3.
9
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
10
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and acceptability of contingency management and problem-solving therapy intervention for enhancing alcohol abstinence: a single-arm, mixed methods pilot clinical trial.用于增强戒酒效果的应急管理和问题解决疗法干预的可行性与可接受性:一项单臂、混合方法的试点临床试验。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e098691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098691.
2
Enhancing public health infectious disease response through the Australian Pathogen Genomics program (AusPathoGen): evaluation protocol.通过澳大利亚病原体基因组学计划(AusPathoGen)加强公共卫生传染病应对:评估方案。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 8;13:1587112. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1587112. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing effective interventions to improve trial retention: do they contain behaviour change techniques?评估改善试验保留率的有效干预措施:它们是否包含行为改变技术?
Trials. 2020 Feb 21;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4151-4.
2
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study.在临床试验中,哪些是最重要的未解决的研究问题?一项詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系:PRioRiTy II(随机试验中优先考虑保留率)研究。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3687-7.
3
The British Columbia Healthy Connections Project: findings on socioeconomic disadvantage in early pregnancy.
Health and incarceration research in Australia: a scoping review.
澳大利亚的健康与监禁研究:一项范围综述。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 18;56:101500. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101500. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Effects of nurse-home visiting on intimate partner violence and maternal income, mental health and self-efficacy by 24 months postpartum: a randomised controlled trial (British Columbia Healthy Connections Project).产后24个月时护士家访对亲密伴侣暴力以及产妇收入、心理健康和自我效能的影响:一项随机对照试验(不列颠哥伦比亚省健康连接项目)
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):e083147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083147.
5
The role of patient ergonomics in improving health research participation.患者工效学在提高健康研究参与度方面的作用。
Appl Ergon. 2025 May;125:104458. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104458. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
6
"This Is Me" an Awareness-Raising and Anti-Stigma Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.“这就是我”:一项针对本科护理专业学生的提高认识和消除耻辱感计划的干预前后研究
Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 12;14(4):2956-2974. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040216.
7
Recruitment and retention of adolescents for an ecological momentary assessment measurement burst mental health study: The MHIM engagement strategy.招募和保留青少年参与生态瞬时评估测量突发心理健康研究:MHIM 参与策略。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14065. doi: 10.1111/hex.14065.
8
Feasibility of diabetes self-management coaching program for individuals with type 2 diabetes in the Ethiopian primary care setting: a protocol for a feasibility mixed-methods parallel-group randomized controlled trial.埃塞俄比亚初级保健环境中2型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理指导项目的可行性:一项可行性混合方法平行组随机对照试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 8;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01487-3.
9
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Housing First for Youth Intervention for Youth Experiencing Homelessness in Canada: Protocol for a Multisite, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.评估“先住房”干预措施对加拿大无家可归青年的有效性:一项多地点、混合方法随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 19;12:e46690. doi: 10.2196/46690.
10
Barriers and Best Practices for the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Emergency Medicine.在急诊医学中使用患者报告结局测量的障碍和最佳实践。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;82(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.12.017. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
不列颠哥伦比亚省健康连接项目:关于妊娠早期社会经济劣势的研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7479-5.
4
Development of the IRIS-AR strategy: an intervention to improve rates of accrual and retention for the VTE-PRO randomized controlled trial.IRIS-AR 策略的制定:一项提高 VTE-PRO 随机对照试验入组和保留率的干预措施。
Trials. 2019 Jul 19;20(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3536-8.
5
Integrating Retention Rates into Economic Analyses of Prevention Interventions.将保留率纳入预防干预措施的经济分析中。
Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):566-574. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0958-6.
6
Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纵向队列研究中的保留策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7.
7
The feasibility of following up prisoners, with mental health problems, after release: a pilot trial employing an innovative system, for engagement and retention in research, with a harder-to-engage population.对出狱后有心理健康问题的囚犯进行随访的可行性:一项采用创新系统的试点试验,旨在使更难接触的人群参与和保留在研究中。
Trials. 2018 Oct 1;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2911-1.
8
Recruitment and retention strategies in mental health trials - A systematic review.精神健康试验中的招募和保留策略 - 系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203127. eCollection 2018.
9
Recruitment and retention strategies for an urban adolescent study: Lessons learned from a multi-center study of community-based asthma self-management intervention for adolescents.招募和保留城市青少年研究参与者的策略:一项基于社区的青少年哮喘自我管理干预多中心研究的经验教训。
J Adolesc. 2018 Jun;65:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
10
Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol.提高随机对照试验中保留率的系统技术:STEER研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0.