• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将保留率纳入预防干预措施的经济分析中。

Integrating Retention Rates into Economic Analyses of Prevention Interventions.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.

School of Social Work, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):566-574. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0958-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-018-0958-6
PMID:30488333
Abstract

Evidence-based prevention interventions hold great promise for enhancing the well-being of individuals, families, and society. As these interventions are implemented in new contexts and at wider scales, policymakers and private sector organizations are increasingly interested in understanding the economic returns that programs produce through reductions of burden on public service systems, such as criminal justice and human services. Thus, it is important to ensure that economic models account for factors, such as retention, which are important when interventions are implemented in real-world contexts with selective populations and voluntary participation. Yet the field of prevention has provided little guidance to help researchers and policymakers analyze the economics of interventions so that estimates reflect the impact of implementation factors on intervention cost-effectiveness. This paper discusses the role retention plays in the economic efficiency of interventions when the prevention of child maltreatment is the primary motivation for funding these programs. We present a conceptual model to serve as a guide for explicit inclusion of retention rates when calculating cost estimates to be used in cost-effectiveness analysis. A case study is presented, demonstrating the variability in estimates dependent on the definition of retention and the estimated retention rate. The results underscore the importance of improving our understanding of factors underlying and related to retention, such as engagement, which may improve the precision of cost and cost-effectiveness analysis in applied settings.

摘要

循证预防干预措施为增进个人、家庭和社会的福祉带来了巨大的希望。随着这些干预措施在新的背景下和更大的范围内实施,政策制定者和私营部门组织越来越有兴趣了解这些项目通过减少公共服务系统(如刑事司法和社会服务)的负担而产生的经济效益。因此,重要的是要确保经济模型考虑到一些因素,如保留率,当干预措施在具有选择性人群和自愿参与的现实环境中实施时,这些因素非常重要。然而,预防领域几乎没有提供什么指导,以帮助研究人员和政策制定者分析干预措施的经济学,以便估计反映实施因素对干预成本效益的影响。本文讨论了在儿童虐待预防是资助这些项目的主要动机的情况下,保留率在干预措施的经济效率中的作用。我们提出了一个概念模型,作为在计算成本效益分析中使用的成本估算时明确纳入保留率的指南。展示了一个案例研究,说明了估计值的变化取决于保留的定义和估计的保留率。结果强调了提高我们对保留率相关因素的理解的重要性,例如参与度,这可能会提高应用环境中成本和成本效益分析的准确性。

相似文献

1
Integrating Retention Rates into Economic Analyses of Prevention Interventions.将保留率纳入预防干预措施的经济分析中。
Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):566-574. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0958-6.
2
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
3
Financing prevention: opportunities for economic analysis across the translational research cycle.预防融资:转化研究周期中的经济分析机遇
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Mar;6(1):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0354-8.
4
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
5
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
6
7
Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.《社区预防服务指南》经济评估系统评价方法。社区预防服务特别工作组。
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):75-91. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00120-8.
8
Dissecting cost-effectiveness analysis for preventive interventions: a guide for decision makers.预防性干预措施的剖析性成本效益分析:决策者指南
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Mar;5(3):301-5.
9
Updated Priorities Among Effective Clinical Preventive Services.有效临床预防服务中的更新优先事项。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):14-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.2017. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
10
"Pay for Success" Financing and Home-Based Multicomponent Childhood Asthma Interventions: Modeling Results From the Detroit Medicaid Population."成功付费"融资与家庭为基础的多种成分儿童哮喘干预:底特律医疗补助人群的建模结果。
Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):272-299. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12325.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement in a Preventive Intervention for Preadolescent Children in Foster Care: Considerations for Intervention Design.参与寄养前青春期儿童的预防干预:干预设计的考虑因素。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Oct;54(5):1373-1385. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01341-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting.保持社区健康研究参与者的参与:标准化规划和报告的案例研究。
Trials. 2020 May 11;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04328-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Principles of Precision Prevention Science for Improving Recruitment and Retention of Participants.精准预防科学原则提高参与者招募和保留率
Prev Sci. 2018 Jul;19(5):689-694. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0884-7.
2
Commentary on "Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science".关于“预防科学中进行和报告经济评估的证据标准”的述评。
Prev Sci. 2018 Apr;19(3):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0885-6.
3
Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science.
预防科学中进行和报告经济评估的证据标准。
Prev Sci. 2018 Apr;19(3):366-390. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0858-1.
4
Visit Attendance Patterns in Nurse-Family Partnership Community Sites.探访护士家庭合作社区点的就诊模式。
Prev Sci. 2018 May;19(4):516-527. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0829-6.
5
Cost-effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme in England: Evidence from the building blocks trial.英国家庭护士伙伴关系(FNP)项目的成本效益:来自基础试验的证据。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1367-1374. doi: 10.1111/jep.12799. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
6
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Two Child Abuse and Neglect Primary Prevention Programs for US States.美国两个儿童虐待和忽视初级预防项目的成本效益分析
Prev Sci. 2018 Aug;19(6):705-715. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0819-8.
7
Financing prevention: opportunities for economic analysis across the translational research cycle.预防融资:转化研究周期中的经济分析机遇
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Mar;6(1):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0354-8.
8
Nurse Family Partnership: Comparing Costs per Family in Randomized Trials Versus Scale-Up.护士家庭伙伴关系:随机试验与扩大规模中每个家庭的成本比较。
J Prim Prev. 2015 Dec;36(6):419-25. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0406-3.
9
Women's reasons for attrition from a nurse home visiting program.女性退出护士家访项目的原因。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):61-70. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12263. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
10
Improving the nurse-family partnership in community practice.改善社区实践中的护士家庭合作关系。
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S110-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1021I.