School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Physiother Res Int. 2020 Jul;25(3):e1839. doi: 10.1002/pri.1839. Epub 2020 May 11.
The objectives of this review were to (a) determine the effectiveness of combined group and home exercise programmes on falls risk factors and falls in community-dwelling older adults at risk of falling compared to no exercise controls; and (b) explore adherence and the behaviour change techniques employed in delivering these interventions.
Five databases were selected to identify randomized controlled trials of exercise and/or physical activity interventions to prevent falls or to improve functional performance. PROSPERO CRD42018106111.
Eighteen trials involving 5,960 participants were included. Meta-analyses showed significant improvements in mobility after combined programmes measured by five times sit to stand (-1.42 times, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.00 to -0.83), timed up and go (-0.94 s, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.12), and gait speed (0.05 m/s, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.07), but not single leg stance time, compared to controls. Combined programmes reduced injurious falls rate (0.77, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.91, I = 0%) but not rate of falls (0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08, I = 66%) compared to controls. There was no change in physical activity. Adherence ranged from 55-96%, with variability in the method of measurement of adherence. There was no clear relationship between adherence and outcomes. Most interventions used the behaviour change techniques of instruction/rehearsal/demonstration and feedback/monitoring.
Group exercise with a home programme resulted in better functional performance and falls-related outcomes compared with a no exercise control group. Further research is needed to identify behaviour change techniques to improve adherence to exercise in this population.
本综述的目的是:(a) 确定与不运动对照组相比,针对有跌倒风险的社区居住老年人的团体和家庭运动方案对跌倒风险因素和跌倒的有效性;(b) 探索在实施这些干预措施时的依从性和所采用的行为改变技术。
选择五个数据库以确定预防跌倒或改善功能表现的运动和/或体育活动干预的随机对照试验。PROSPERO CRD42018106111。
纳入了 18 项涉及 5960 名参与者的试验。荟萃分析显示,在经过联合方案治疗后,移动能力有了显著改善,通过五次坐立站起(-1.42 倍,95%置信区间[CI] -2.00 至-0.83)、计时起立行走(-0.94 秒,95%CI -1.76 至-0.12)和步态速度(0.05 米/秒,95%CI 0.02 至 0.07)得到了改善,但单腿站立时间没有得到改善,与对照组相比。与对照组相比,联合方案降低了伤害性跌倒发生率(0.77,95%CI 0.65 至 0.91,I = 0%),但未降低跌倒发生率(0.86,95%CI 0.68 至 1.08,I = 66%)。身体活动没有变化。依从性范围为 55-96%,测量依从性的方法存在差异。依从性与结果之间没有明确的关系。大多数干预措施采用了指令/复述/演示和反馈/监测的行为改变技术。
与不运动对照组相比,团体运动与家庭运动方案相结合可改善功能表现和跌倒相关结局。需要进一步研究以确定行为改变技术,以提高该人群对运动的依从性。