Suppr超能文献

计算机化方法在无创性血管造影衍生的血流储备分数评估中的应用:一项关键性综述。

Computerised Methodologies for Non-Invasive Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: A Critical Review.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University London, UK.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 20;2020:6381637. doi: 10.1155/2020/6381637. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve is the gold standard for assessing the haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Cumulative evidence has shown that FFR-guided revascularisation reduces stent implantations and improves patient outcomes. However, despite the wealth of evidence and guideline recommendations, its use in clinical practice remains minimal. Patient and technical limitations of FFR as well as the need for intracoronary instrumentation, use of adenosine, and increased costs have limited FFR's applicability in clinical practice. Over the last decade, several angiography-derived FFR software packages have been developed which do not require intracoronary pressure assessment with a guidewire or need for administration of hyperaemic agents. At present, there are 3 commercially available software packages and several other non-commercial technologies that have been described in the literature. These technologies have been validated against invasive FFR showing good accuracy and correlation. However, the methodology behind these solutions is different-some algorithms are based on solving the governing equations of fluid dynamics such as the Navier-Stokes equation while others have opted for a more simplified mathematical formula approach. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the methodology behind all the known angiography-derived FFR technologies highlighting the key differences and limitations.

摘要

血流储备分数是评估中等程度冠状动脉狭窄血流动力学意义的金标准。越来越多的证据表明,FFR 指导的血运重建可减少支架植入,并改善患者预后。然而,尽管有大量的证据和指南推荐,但其在临床实践中的应用仍然很少。FFR 的患者和技术限制,以及对冠状动脉内仪器的需求、腺苷的使用和增加的成本限制了 FFR 在临床实践中的适用性。在过去的十年中,已经开发了几种基于血管造影的 FFR 软件包,这些软件包不需要使用导丝进行冠状动脉内压力评估,也不需要使用血管扩张药物。目前,有 3 种商业上可用的软件包和其他几种文献中描述的非商业技术。这些技术已经通过与有创 FFR 进行验证,显示出良好的准确性和相关性。然而,这些解决方案背后的方法是不同的——一些算法基于求解流体动力学的控制方程,如纳维-斯托克斯方程,而另一些则选择了更简化的数学公式方法。本综述的目的是批判性地评估所有已知的基于血管造影的 FFR 技术背后的方法,强调关键的差异和局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff1/7189319/177e589eebb8/JITC2020-6381637.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验