Suppr超能文献

公共知识库要求是否加剧了多样性的缺乏?

Are Public Repository Requirements Exacerbating Lack of Diversity?

机构信息

Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, USA; HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.

出版信息

Trends Genet. 2020 Jun;36(6):390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

Abstract

Although public repository requirements are aimed at researchers and designed to ensure that the utility of the limited data we have is optimized, these policies also have ramifications for research participants. In this opinion article, I discuss how the nature of such repositories can subject participants whose data are 'banked' to unwitting participation in scientific projects they might find objectionable. In addition, concerns about the privacy of banked genomic data are exacerbated by recent projects that demonstrate the ability to re-identify genomic data, raising the specter of discriminatory or oppressive use of this information. These concerns are most likely to discourage participation in research that requires data sharing among those who have experienced these phenomena and are less likely to discount their likelihood.

摘要

尽管公共存储库的要求针对的是研究人员,旨在确保我们拥有的有限数据的效用得到优化,但这些政策也对研究参与者产生影响。在这篇观点文章中,我讨论了这些存储库的性质如何使那些其数据被“存储”的参与者在不知不觉中参与到他们可能反对的科学项目中。此外,最近的一些项目表明可以重新识别基因组数据,这加剧了人们对存储的基因组数据隐私的担忧,引发了对这种信息的歧视性或压迫性使用的担忧。这些担忧很可能会阻碍那些需要经历过这些现象的人之间进行数据共享的研究的参与,而且不太可能降低这种可能性。

相似文献

1
Are Public Repository Requirements Exacerbating Lack of Diversity?
Trends Genet. 2020 Jun;36(6):390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
The Importance, Challenges, and Possible Solutions for Sharing Proteomics Data While Safeguarding Individuals' Privacy.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2024 Mar;23(3):100731. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100731. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
A metadata schema for data objects in clinical research.
Trials. 2016 Nov 24;17(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1686-5.
4
Ethical concerns on sharing genomic data including patients' family members.
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 18;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0310-5.
5
Australia: regulating genomic data sharing to promote public trust.
Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;137(8):583-591. doi: 10.1007/s00439-018-1914-z. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
A FAIR guide for data providers to maximise sharing of human genomic data.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Mar 15;14(3):e1005873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005873. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Genet Med. 2010 Aug;12(8):486-95. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e38f9e.
10
Ten quick tips for sharing open genomic data.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Dec 27;14(12):e1006472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006472. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Recruiting diversity where it exists: The Alabama Genomic Health Initiative.
J Genet Couns. 2020 Jun;29(3):471-478. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1258. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
3
Re-identification of individuals in genomic data-sharing beacons via allele inference.
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):365-371. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty643.
4
Sociogenetic Risks - Ancestry DNA Testing, Third-Party Identity, and Protection of Privacy.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 2;379(5):410-412. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1805870. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
"I don't want to be Henrietta Lacks": diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research.
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):107-113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0032-6. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research.
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Mar;19(3):175-185. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.89. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Genomics is failing on diversity.
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
8
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.
Genet Med. 2016 Jul;18(7):663-71. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.138. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
9
Data re-identification: societal safeguards.
Science. 2013 Mar 1;339(6123):1032-3. doi: 10.1126/science.339.6123.1032-c.
10
To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research.
Genet Med. 2011 Nov;13(11):948-55. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182227589.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验