Suppr超能文献

美国城市公立学校中父母的教育程度与社会环境:黑人的收益递减。

Parental Educational Attainment and Social Environmental of Urban Public Schools in the U.S.: Blacks' Diminished Returns.

作者信息

Boyce Shanika, Bazargan Mohsen, Caldwell Cleopatra H, Zimmerman Marc A, Assari Shervin

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA.

Departments of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2020 May 10;7(5):44. doi: 10.3390/children7050044.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research has documented marginalization-related diminished returns (MDRs) of socioeconomic status (SES), defined as weaker effects of SES indicators, such as parental educational attainment, on securing tangible outcomes for the members of socially marginalized (e.g., racial and ethnic minority) groups, compared to privileged social groups (e.g., non-Hispanic Whites).

AIMS

To explore race/ethnic differences between non-Hispanic Blacks vs. non-Hispanic Whites who attend urban public schools on the effect of parental education on lower school environmental risk among American high schoolers.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional study, we borrowed the Education Longitudinal Study (ELS-2002) baseline data, a nationally representative study that enrolled 1706 10th grade youths who were attending urban public schools. From this number, 805 (47.2%) were non-Hispanic Black and 901 (52.8%) were non-Hispanic White youths. The dependent variable was the level of school social environmental risk measured using 18 items as self-reported, and was treated as a continuous variable. The independent variable was parental educational attainment, treated as a continuous measure. Gender, region, and parental marital status were the covariates. Race/ethnicity was the moderating variable. Linear regressions were applied to perform our data analysis.

RESULTS

Black students were found to attend schools with higher levels of social environmental risk. Youths with parents with a higher educational attainment were found to attend schools with a lower social environmental risk. We found a significant interaction between race (non-Hispanic Black vs. non-Hispanic White) and parental educational attainment on the level of school social environmental risk, suggesting that the protective effect of high parental education on reducing the school social environmental risk was smaller for non-Hispanic Black than for non-Hispanic White youths.

CONCLUSIONS

Although high parental educational attainment is protective against social environmental risk for American youths, this protective effect is weaker for non-Hispanic Black than non-Hispanic White youths. The diminished returns of parental education in reducing school social environmental risk may explain why the effects of parental education on educational outcomes are smaller for non-Hispanic Black than non-Hispanic White youths (i.e., MDRs). The social environment indirectly generates racial youth educational disparities through deteriorating non-Hispanic Black youth educational outcomes across all SES levels. To prevent the confounding effects of private, suburban, rural, and Catholic schools, we limited this analysis to public urban schools. More research is needed on other settings.

摘要

背景

最近的研究记录了社会经济地位(SES)与边缘化相关的收益递减(MDRs),即与特权社会群体(如非西班牙裔白人)相比,SES指标(如父母教育程度)对保障社会边缘化群体(如种族和少数民族)成员获得切实成果的影响较弱。

目的

探讨在城市公立学校就读的非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人在美国高中生中,父母教育对降低学校环境风险的影响方面的种族/民族差异。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们借用了教育纵向研究(ELS - 2002)的基线数据,这是一项具有全国代表性的研究,纳入了1706名就读于城市公立学校的十年级青少年。其中,805名(47.2%)是非西班牙裔黑人,901名(52.8%)是非西班牙裔白人青少年。因变量是使用18个自我报告项目测量的学校社会环境风险水平,并被视为连续变量。自变量是父母教育程度,被视为连续测量指标。性别、地区和父母婚姻状况是协变量。种族/民族是调节变量。应用线性回归进行数据分析。

结果

发现黑人学生就读的学校社会环境风险水平较高。父母教育程度较高的青少年就读的学校社会环境风险较低。我们发现种族(非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人)和父母教育程度在学校社会环境风险水平上存在显著交互作用,这表明父母高教育程度对降低学校社会环境风险的保护作用,非西班牙裔黑人青少年比非西班牙裔白人青少年更小。

结论

虽然父母高教育程度对美国青少年的社会环境风险具有保护作用,但这种保护作用对非西班牙裔黑人青少年比对非西班牙裔白人青少年更弱。父母教育在降低学校社会环境风险方面的收益递减,可能解释了为什么父母教育对非西班牙裔黑人青少年教育成果的影响比对非西班牙裔白人青少年更小(即MDRs)。社会环境通过恶化所有SES水平的非西班牙裔黑人青少年教育成果,间接产生了种族青少年教育差距。为防止私立、郊区、农村和天主教学校的混杂效应,我们将此分析限制在城市公立学校。在其他环境中还需要更多研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验