Schindler Cora R, Lustenberger Thomas, Marzi Ingo, Verboket René D
Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg. 2021 Jan;124(1):40-47. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00819-1.
In addition to highly specialized medicine, the initial treatment of wounds and minor surgical interventions are generally necessary basic services of emergency care in hospitals. The reimbursement of outpatient emergency services for persons with statutory insurance is currently based on the uniform assessment standard (EBM), where the recording of business expenses in the private practice sector serves as the basis for the calculation. Hospitals have considerably higher maintenance costs than medical practices.
In this article the resulting cost-revenue ratio of outpatient wound care in an emergency department is analyzed through the reimbursement according to EBM.
The data were collected in the emergency surgical department of the University Hospital Frankfurt am Main over 12 months. Included were all patients who received sutured wound care during this period. The costs incurred were compared to the remuneration according to EBM 01210 (or 01212) with the additional flat rate for small surgical procedures EBM 02301.
During the observation period 1548 patients were treated, i.e. 19.52% of all trauma surgery cases. The resulting costs of a standard wound care of 45.40 € are offset by a remuneration of 31.83 €. The calculation of the total revenue shows a deficit amount of 13.57 € per outpatient case, this corresponds to an annual deficit of 21,006.36 €.
It could be shown that even without consideration of the relevant holding costs, cost coverage cannot be achieved in any case. The previous reimbursement of outpatient wound care on the basis of the EBM appears to be inadequate. In the future, an adjustment or supplementary remuneration seems to be necessary in order to ensure sufficient quality of care.
除了高度专业化的医学外,伤口的初始治疗和小型外科手术通常是医院急诊护理的必要基本服务。法定保险人员的门诊急诊服务报销目前基于统一评估标准(EBM),其中私人执业部门业务费用的记录作为计算基础。医院的维护成本比医疗诊所高得多。
本文通过根据EBM进行报销来分析急诊科门诊伤口护理的成本收益比。
数据收集于美因河畔法兰克福大学医院的急诊外科,为期12个月。纳入在此期间接受缝合伤口护理的所有患者。将产生的成本与根据EBM 01210(或01212)以及小型外科手术额外统一费率EBM 02301的报酬进行比较。
在观察期内,共治疗了1548例患者,即所有创伤手术病例的19.52%。标准伤口护理产生的成本为45.40欧元,而报酬为31.83欧元。总收入计算显示,每例门诊病例亏损13.57欧元,这相当于每年亏损21,006.36欧元。
可以看出,即使不考虑相关持有成本,在任何情况下都无法实现成本覆盖。以前基于EBM的门诊伤口护理报销似乎不足。未来,为了确保足够的护理质量,似乎有必要进行调整或补充报酬。