Suppr超能文献

不同大规模药物治疗策略对非洲获得和维持 和 感染控制的影响。

Impact of Different Mass Drug Administration Strategies for Gaining and Sustaining Control of and Infection in Africa.

机构信息

1Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

2Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation, Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1_Suppl):14-23. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0829.

Abstract

This report summarizes the design and outcomes of randomized controlled operational research trials performed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-funded Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation (SCORE) from 2009 to 2019. Their goal was to define the effectiveness and test the limitations of current WHO-recommended schistosomiasis control protocols by performing large-scale pragmatic trials to compare the impact of different schedules and coverage regimens of praziquantel mass drug administration (MDA). Although there were limitations to study designs and performance, analysis of their primary outcomes confirmed that all tested regimens of praziquantel MDA significantly reduced local infection prevalence and intensity among school-age children. Secondary analysis suggested that outcomes in locations receiving four annual rounds of MDA were better than those in communities that had treatment holiday years, in which no praziquantel MDA was given. Statistical significance of differences was obscured by a wider-than-expected variation in community-level responses to MDA, defining a persistent hot spot obstacle to MDA success. No MDA schedule led to elimination of infection, even in those communities that started at low prevalence of infection, and it is likely that programs aiming for elimination of transmission will need to add supplemental interventions (e.g., snail control, improvement in water, sanitation and hygiene, and behavior change interventions) to achieve that next stage of control. Recommendations for future implementation research, including exploration of the value of earlier program impact assessment combined with intensification of intervention in hot spot locations, are discussed.

摘要

本报告总结了比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会资助的血吸虫病合作研究与评价机构(SCORE)在 2009 年至 2019 年期间进行的随机对照操作性研究试验的设计和结果。他们的目标是通过进行大规模实用试验来定义当前世界卫生组织推荐的血吸虫病控制方案的有效性,并测试其局限性,以比较不同吡喹酮大规模药物治疗(MDA)时间表和覆盖范围方案的影响。尽管研究设计和实施存在局限性,但对其主要结果的分析证实,所有测试的吡喹酮 MDA 方案均显著降低了学龄儿童的当地感染流行率和强度。二次分析表明,在接受四轮年度 MDA 的地点的结果优于那些有治疗假期的社区,在这些社区中没有给予吡喹酮 MDA。MDA 方案的差异统计意义因 MDA 对社区一级反应的预期变化而变得模糊不清,这定义了 MDA 成功的持续热点障碍。即使在那些感染率较低的社区,也没有 MDA 方案能消除感染,而且很可能旨在消除传播的项目需要添加补充干预措施(例如,钉螺控制、改善水、卫生和个人卫生以及行为改变干预措施),以实现下一阶段的控制。讨论了未来实施研究的建议,包括探索早期方案影响评估与强化热点地区干预相结合的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d5e/7351298/b23a684385c0/tpmd190829f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验