Programa de Residência Multiprofissional em Saúde: Ênfase em Atenção em Terapia Intensiva, Universidade Federal de Ciências de Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Ciências de Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Mar;32(1):133-142. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200019. Epub 2020 May 8.
This systematic review of longitudinal studies aimed to evaluate the effect of enteral feeding of critically ill adult and pediatric patients in the prone position on gastric residual volume and other clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus and Embase using terms related to population and intervention. Two independent reviewers analyzed the titles and abstracts, and data collection was performed using a standardized form. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated considering the potential for systematic errors, and the data were qualitatively analyzed. Four studies with adult patients and one with preterm patients were included. The gastric residual volume was evaluated as the main outcome: three studies did not show differences in the gastric residual volume between the prone and supine positions (p > 0.05), while one study showed a higher gastric residual volume during enteral feeding in the prone position (27.6mL versus 10.6mL; p < 0.05), and another group observed a greater gastric residual volume in the supine position (reduction of the gastric residual volume by 23.3% in the supine position versus 43.9% in the prone position; p < 0.01). Two studies evaluated the frequency of vomiting; one study found that it was higher in the prone position (30 versus 26 episodes; p < 0.001), while the other study found no significant difference (p > 0.05). The incidence of aspiration pneumonia and death were evaluated in one study, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05). The literature on the administration of enteral feeding in the prone position in critically ill patients is sparse and of limited quality, and the results regarding gastric residual volume are contradictory. Observational studies with appropriate sample sizes should be conducted to support conclusions on the subject.
这篇系统评价的纵向研究旨在评估对重症成人和儿科患者在俯卧位进行肠内喂养对胃残留量和其他临床结果的影响。使用与人群和干预相关的术语在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库中进行了文献检索。两位独立的审查员分析了标题和摘要,并使用标准化表格进行了数据收集。分歧由第三位审查员解决。考虑到系统误差的可能性,评估了研究的方法学质量,并对数据进行了定性分析。纳入了四项成人患者的研究和一项早产儿患者的研究。胃残留量是评估的主要结果:三项研究表明俯卧位与仰卧位之间胃残留量没有差异(p>0.05),而一项研究表明俯卧位时肠内喂养的胃残留量更高(27.6mL 与 10.6mL;p<0.05),另一组观察到仰卧位时胃残留量更大(仰卧位时胃残留量减少 23.3%,俯卧位时减少 43.9%;p<0.01)。两项研究评估了呕吐的频率;一项研究发现俯卧位时更高(30 次与 26 次;p<0.001),而另一项研究则没有发现差异(p>0.05)。一项研究评估了吸入性肺炎和死亡的发生率,两组之间无差异(p>0.05)。关于重症患者俯卧位肠内喂养的文献很少,且质量有限,关于胃残留量的结果存在矛盾。应该进行具有适当样本量的观察性研究,以支持关于该主题的结论。