Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 32 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Cincinnati VA Medical Center, 3100 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45220, United States.
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104165. Epub 2020 May 6.
Identify opportunities to improve the interaction between clinicians and Tele-Critical Care (Tele-CC) programs through an analysis of alert occurrence and reactivation in a specific Tele-CC application.
Data were collected automatically through the Philips eCaremanager® software system used at multiple hospitals in the Avera health system. We evaluated the distribution of alerts per patient, frequency of alert types, time between consecutive alerts, and Tele-CC clinician choice of alert reactivation times.
Each patient generated an average of 79.8 alerts during their ICU stay (median 31.0; 25th - 75th percentile 10.0-89.0) with 46.4 for blood pressure and 38.4 for oxygenation. The most frequent alerts for continuous physiological parameters were: MAP limit (28.9 %), O/RR (26.4 %), MAP trend (16.5 %), HR trend (12.1 %), and HR limit (11.3 %). The median time between consecutive alerts for one parameter was less than 10 min for 86 % of patients. Tele-CC providers responded to all alert types with immediate reactivation 47-88 % of the time. Limit alerts had longer reactivation times than their trend alert counterparts (p-value < .001).
The alert type specific differences in frequency, time occurrence and provider choice of reactivation time provide insight into how clinicians interact with the Tele-CC system. Systems engineering enhancements to Tele-CC software algorithms may reduce alert burden and thereby decrease clinicians' cognitive workload for alert assessment. Further study of Tele-CC alert generation, alert presentation to clinicians, and the clinicians' options to respond to these alerts may reduce provider workload, minimize alert desensitization, and optimize the ability of Tele-CC clinicians to provide efficient and timely critical care management.
通过分析特定远程关键护理(Tele-CC)应用程序中的警报发生和重新激活情况,确定改善临床医生与 Tele-CC 之间交互的机会。
数据通过飞利浦 eCaremanager®软件系统自动收集,该系统在 Avera 医疗系统的多家医院使用。我们评估了每个患者的警报分布、警报类型的频率、连续警报之间的时间间隔以及 Tele-CC 临床医生选择的警报重新激活时间。
每位患者在 ICU 住院期间平均产生 79.8 次警报(中位数 31.0;25 分位-75 分位 10.0-89.0),其中 46.4 次为血压警报,38.4 次为氧合警报。连续生理参数的最常见警报为:MAP 限制(28.9%)、O/RR(26.4%)、MAP 趋势(16.5%)、HR 趋势(12.1%)和 HR 限制(11.3%)。对于 86%的患者,一个参数的连续警报之间的中位数时间不到 10 分钟。Tele-CC 提供者立即重新激活所有警报类型的时间为 47%-88%。限制定时警报的重新激活时间长于其趋势警报对应物(p 值<0.001)。
频率、时间发生和临床医生重新激活时间的警报类型特定差异提供了有关临床医生如何与 Tele-CC 系统交互的见解。Tele-CC 软件算法的系统工程增强可能会减少警报负担,从而降低临床医生评估警报的认知工作量。进一步研究 Tele-CC 警报生成、向临床医生呈现警报以及临床医生对这些警报的响应选项,可能会减少提供者的工作量,最小化警报脱敏,并优化 Tele-CC 临床医生提供高效和及时的关键护理管理的能力。