Haile Mesfin, Bae Hyung Min, Kang Won Hee
Department of Horticulture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.
Convergence Program of Coffee Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 May 11;9(5):408. doi: 10.3390/antiox9050408.
There are different types of coffee processing methods. The wet (WP) and dry processing (DP) methods are widely practiced in different parts of coffee-growing countries. There is also a digestive bioprocessing method in which the most expensive coffee is produced. The elephant dung coffee is produced using the digestive bioprocessing method. In the present experiment, the antioxidant activity and volatile compounds of coffee that have been processed using different methods were compared. The antioxidant activity, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and total tannin content (TTC) of green coffee beans from all treatments were higher as compared to roasted coffee beans. Regarding the green coffee beans, the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity of elephant dung coffee beans was higher as compared to that of the DP and WP coffee beans. The green coffee beans had higher DPPH activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) value compared to the roasted coffee beans. The green beans of elephant dung coffee had a high TPC than the beans obtained by WP and DP methods. TFC in elephant dung coffee in both green and roasted condition was improved in contrast to the beans processed using dry and wet methods. The elephant dung coffee had an increased TTC in comparison to the DP and WP coffee (green beans). About 37 volatile compounds of acids, alcohols, aldehydes, amide, esters, ethers, furans, furanones, ketones, phenols, pyrazines, pyridines, Heterocyclic N, and pyrroles functional classes have been found. Some of the most abundant volatile compounds detected in all treatments of coffee were 2-furanmethanol, acetic acid, 2-methylpyrazine, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, pyridine, and 5-methylfurfural. Few volatile compounds have been detected only in elephant dung coffee. The principal component analysis (PCAs) was performed using the percentage of relative peak areas of the volatile compound classes and individual volatile compounds. This study will provide a better understanding of the impacts of processing methods on the antioxidants and volatile compounds of coffee.
咖啡有不同的加工方法。湿法(WP)和干法(DP)加工方法在咖啡种植国家的不同地区广泛应用。还有一种消化生物加工方法,用这种方法生产的咖啡最为昂贵。象屎咖啡就是采用消化生物加工方法生产的。在本实验中,对采用不同方法加工的咖啡的抗氧化活性和挥发性化合物进行了比较。与烘焙咖啡豆相比,所有处理的生咖啡豆的抗氧化活性、总酚含量(TPC)、总黄酮含量(TFC)和总单宁含量(TTC)都更高。对于生咖啡豆,象屎咖啡豆的2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)自由基清除活性高于DP和WP咖啡豆。与烘焙咖啡豆相比,生咖啡豆具有更高的DPPH活性和铁还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)值。象屎咖啡的生豆TPC高于WP和DP方法获得的咖啡豆。与采用干法和湿法加工的咖啡豆相比,象屎咖啡在生豆和烘焙状态下的TFC都有所提高。与DP和WP咖啡(生豆)相比,象屎咖啡的TTC有所增加。已发现约37种挥发性化合物,属于酸、醇、醛、酰胺、酯、醚、呋喃、呋喃酮、酮、酚、吡嗪、吡啶、杂环氮和吡咯等功能类别。在所有咖啡处理中检测到的一些最丰富的挥发性化合物是糠醇、乙酸、2-甲基吡嗪、2,6-二甲基吡嗪、吡啶和5-甲基糠醛。仅在象屎咖啡中检测到少量挥发性化合物。使用挥发性化合物类别和单个挥发性化合物的相对峰面积百分比进行主成分分析(PCA)。本研究将有助于更好地理解加工方法对咖啡抗氧化剂和挥发性化合物的影响。