Al Ahdal Khold, Al Deeb Laila, Al-Hamdan Rana S, Bin-Shuwaish Mohammed S, Al Deeb Modhi, Maawadh Ahmed M, AlHelal Abdulaziz, Vohra Fahim, Abduljabbar Tariq
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P. O. Box 60169, Riyadh, 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Sep;31:101805. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101805. Epub 2020 May 11.
To evaluate the effect of different photosensitizer on extrusion bond strength of glass fiber post to radicular dentin.
Forty maxillary and mandibular central incisors were disinfected and decoronated. Mechanical instrumentation of canal was performed using protaper NiTi. Shaping and cleaning of canal comprised of S1, S2, SX with finishing files F1 and F2, followed by continuous irrigation. Canals were dried and obturated with gutta percha. Peso reamers were used to prepare post space. Based on the photosensitizers (PS) used, the samples were divided into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: treated with methylene blue photosensitizer (MBP) at 50 mg/l, Group 2: Curcumin photosensitizer (CP) at 500 mg/l, Group 3: canal space was filled with Toluidine blue photosensitizer (TB) at 100 mg/l. All photosensitizers were activated using different lasers. The samples in group 4 (control) were irrigated using 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) + 17% ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA). Posts were cemented and teeth were sectioned into coronal, middle and apical sections. All sections were placed in universal testing machine to evaluate extrusion bond strength in megapascal (MPa). Fracture pattern analysis of samples were seen under stereomicroscope at 50x magnification and categorized into adhesive, cohesive and admixed. Assessment of extrusion bond strength was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple comparison test (p = 0.05).
The highest bond strength was achieved in group 2, including samples treated with curcumin photosensitizer (CP) at all three root levels; cervical (9.01 ± 1.62 MPa), middle (7.95 ± 0.75 MPa) and apical (5.81 ± 0.15 MPa). Whereas, the lowest extrusion bond strength was observed in group 4 (canal irrigated with conventional 5.25% NaOCl +17% EDTA) at coronal (6.10 ± 1.77 MPa), middle (5.11 ± 0.75 MPa) and apical one-thirds (3.65 ± 0.14 MPa). Intra group comparison revealed decrease in extrusion bond strength from coronal to apical direction. Moreover, both group 2 and group 3 showed statistically significant difference to samples in control group and group 1. (p < 0.05).
TB and CP at concentration of 100 mg/l and 500 mg/l has the potential to be used as an alternate to conventional cleaning regime. TB and CP at this concentration when activated with PDT is likely to improve extrusion bond values.
评估不同光敏剂对玻璃纤维桩与根管牙本质间的推出粘结强度的影响。
选取40颗上颌和下颌中切牙进行消毒并去除冠部。使用Protaper镍钛器械对根管进行机械预备。根管的成形和清理包括使用S1、S2、SX锉及F1和F2完成锉,随后持续冲洗。根管干燥后用牙胶充填。使用Peso扩孔钻制备桩道。根据所使用的光敏剂(PS),将样本分为三组(n = 10)。第1组:用50mg/L的亚甲蓝光敏剂(MBP)处理;第2组:用500mg/L的姜黄素光敏剂(CP)处理;第3组:根管内充满100mg/L的甲苯胺蓝光敏剂(TB)。所有光敏剂均用不同激光激活。第4组(对照组)样本用5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)+ 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗。粘结桩后将牙齿切成冠部、中部和根尖部切片。将所有切片置于万能试验机中以评估以兆帕(MPa)为单位的推出粘结强度。在50倍放大率下于体视显微镜下观察样本的断裂模式分析,并分为粘结性、内聚性和混合性。通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey多重比较检验进行推出粘结强度评估(p = 0.05)。
第2组在所有三个牙根水平均获得了最高粘结强度,包括用姜黄素光敏剂(CP)处理的样本;颈部(9.01±1.62MPa)、中部(7.95±0.75MPa)和根尖部(5.81±0.15MPa)。而在第4组(用传统的5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA冲洗根管)中,冠部(6.10±1.77MPa)、中部(5.11±0.75MPa)和根尖三分之一处(3.65±0.14MPa)观察到最低的推出粘结强度。组内比较显示推出粘结强度从冠部到根尖方向降低。此外,第2组和第3组与对照组和第1组的样本相比均显示出统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。
浓度为100mg/L和500mg/L的TB和CP有潜力作为传统清理方法的替代方法。当用光动力疗法激活时,此浓度的TB和CP可能会提高推出粘结值。