College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
mSphere. 2020 May 13;5(3):e00120-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00120-20.
As a natural host species for , pregnant sheep offer an ideal model to evaluate vaccine candidates for safety. strain Rev. 1 has been used almost exclusively to prevent brucellosis in small ruminants, but it causes abortions when given to pregnant animals. To evaluate the comparative safety of the candidate 16M, pregnant sheep ( = 6) were vaccinated subcutaneously with 1 × 10 CFU/ml of 16M or 1 × 10 CFU/ml Rev. 1 at a highly susceptible stage of gestation (approximately 70 days). 16M resulted in only 1 abortion (1 of 6) compared with 4 of 6 (66.7%) abortions in the Rev. 1 cohort. The placenta was evaluated by culture to determine if vaccination resulted in colonization. As another measure of safety, effects of on the fetus/offspring (vertical transmission) was evaluated by culture and histopathology of fetal tissues to determine if vaccination prevented infection of the fetus. Vaccination with 16M resulted in less vertical transmission than Rev. 1. To determine if vaccination was efficacious and could reduce tissue colonization in sheep, the same cohort of sheep were challenged 5 weeks postpartum by conjunctival inoculation with 1 × 10 CFU/ml Protection was similar between Rev. 1 and 16M, with no statistical difference in colonization in the target organs. Overall, the 16M vaccine was considered safer than Rev. 1 based on a reduced number of abortions and limited infection in the offspring. Future experiments are needed to further refine the vaccine dose to increase the safety margin and to evaluate protection in pregnant ewes. Brucellosis is one of the most commonly reported zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution. Of the 12 species, is considered the most virulent and causes reproductive failure (abortions/stillbirths) in small ruminants, which can spread the disease to other animals or to humans. Vaccination of small ruminants is a key measure used to protect both human and animal health. However, the commercially available live-attenuated vaccine for Rev. 1 retains virulence and can cause disease in animals and humans. In order to evaluate the safety and efficacy in sheep, we vaccinated pregnant sheep with 16M Our results indicate that 16M was safer for use during pregnancy, provided a similar level of protection as Rev. 1, and could be considered an improved candidate for future vaccine trials.
作为 的天然宿主物种,怀孕绵羊为评估疫苗候选物的安全性提供了理想模型。 菌株 Rev.1 几乎专门用于预防小反刍动物中的布鲁氏菌病,但当给予怀孕动物时会引起流产。为了评估候选疫苗 16M 的相对安全性,将怀孕绵羊(n=6)在妊娠高度易感阶段(约 70 天)经皮下接种 1×10 CFU/ml 的 16M 或 1×10 CFU/ml Rev.1。与 Rev.1 组的 6 只中的 4 只(66.7%)流产相比,16M 仅导致 1 只流产(6 只中的 1 只)。通过培养评估胎盘,以确定接种是否导致定植。作为安全性的另一个衡量标准,通过培养和胎儿组织的组织病理学评估对胎儿/后代(垂直传播)的影响,以确定接种是否防止胎儿感染。与 Rev.1 相比,用 16M 接种导致的垂直传播较少。为了确定接种是否有效并能减少绵羊中的组织定植,同一批绵羊在产后 5 周通过结膜接种 1×10 CFU/ml 进行挑战。Rev.1 和 16M 之间的保护作用相似,目标器官中的定植没有统计学差异。总体而言,基于流产数量减少和后代感染有限,16M 疫苗被认为比 Rev.1 更安全。未来的实验需要进一步优化疫苗剂量,以增加安全性,并评估怀孕母羊的保护作用。布鲁氏菌病是分布最广的最常报告的人畜共患疾病之一。在 12 个种中, 被认为是最具毒力的,会导致小反刍动物的生殖失败(流产/死产),这可能会将疾病传播给其他动物或人类。对小反刍动物进行疫苗接种是保护人类和动物健康的关键措施之一。然而,市售的用于 的活减毒疫苗 Rev.1 仍保留毒力,可引起动物和人类患病。为了评估绵羊中的安全性和有效性,我们用 16M 疫苗接种怀孕绵羊。我们的结果表明,16M 在怀孕期间使用更安全,提供了与 Rev.1 相似的保护水平,可被视为未来疫苗试验的改进候选物。