Suppr超能文献

近红外光透照术用于恒牙牙本质邻面龋检测的性能

performance of near-infrared light transillumination for dentine proximal caries detection in permanent teeth.

作者信息

Dündar Ayşe, Çiftçi Mehmet Ertuğrul, İşman Özlem, Aktan Ali Murat

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Private Office, Gaziantep, Turkey.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2020 May;32(4):187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to confirm the detection of proximal caries using near-infrared light transillumination (NILTI) (DIAGNOcam) device, and to compare the diagnostic performance of the device with other caries detection methods, including visual examination using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), bitewing radiography (BW), an LED-based device (Midwest Caries I.D.), and a laser fluorescence device (LFpen).

METHODS

A total of 974 proximal surface of permanent posterior teeth from 34 patients (19 females and 15 males between the ages of 22-55) were evaluated in the present study. After clinical examination of each proximal surface by an experienced examiner, they were coded according to the ICDAS criteria and subsequently with BW, the NILTI, LED, and LFpen. The proximal dentin caries of 106 were opened based on the combination of visual, NILTI and radiographic assessment and validated; and were treated with restorative materials. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The highest sensitivity values were recorded from NILTI readings (99.1%), followed by BW scores (86.8%). The highest specificity values were recorded from ICDAS (100%). The best AUC values were found from the NILTI readings (0.97), followed by BW (0.93) and ICDAS (0.87).

CONCLUSION

The NILTI device exhibited the best performance in terms of detecting proximal dentin caries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过近红外光透照(NILTI)(DIAGNOcam)设备确认近端龋的检测情况,并将该设备的诊断性能与其他龋病检测方法进行比较,包括使用国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)的视觉检查、咬合翼片X线摄影(BW)、基于发光二极管的设备(Midwest Caries I.D.)以及激光荧光设备(LFpen)。

方法

本研究共评估了34例患者(年龄在22 - 55岁之间,19名女性和15名男性)974颗恒牙后牙的近端表面。在由经验丰富的检查者对每个近端表面进行临床检查后,根据ICDAS标准对其进行编码,随后再使用BW、NILTI、发光二极管设备和LFpen进行检查。基于视觉、NILTI和影像学评估的组合,对106例近端牙本质龋进行了开髓并验证;并用修复材料进行治疗。对数据进行描述性统计分析,并计算敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

NILTI读数记录的敏感性值最高(99.1%),其次是BW评分(86.8%)。ICDAS记录的特异性值最高(100%)。NILTI读数的AUC值最佳(0.97),其次是BW(0.93)和ICDAS(0.87)。

结论

在检测近端牙本质龋方面,NILTI设备表现出最佳性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验