Bussaneli D G, Restrepo M, Boldieri T, Albertoni T H, Santos-Pinto L, Cordeiro R C L
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rua Humaitá 1680, Araraquara, 14801-903, SP, Brazil.
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Dec;30(9):2239-44. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1798-2. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the performance of visual exam with use of the Nyvad criteria (visual examination - (VE)), interproximal radiography (BW), laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent Pen-DDPen), and their association in the diagnosis of proximal lesions in primary teeth. For this purpose, 45 children (n = 59 surfaces) of both sexes, aged between 5 and 9 years were selected, who presented healthy primary molars or primary molars with signs suggestive of the presence of caries lesions. The surfaces were clinically evaluated and coded according to the Nyvad criteria and immediately afterwards with the DDPen. Radiographic exam was performed only on the surfaces coded with Nyvad scores 2, 3, 5, or 6. Active caries lesions and/or those with discontinuous surfaces were restored, considering the depth of lesion as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under ROC curve were calculated for each technique and its associations. Visual exam with Nyvad criteria presented the highest specificity, accuracy, and area under ROC curve values. The DDPen presented the highest sensitivity values. Association with one or more methods resulted in an increase in specificity. The performance of visual, radiographic, and DDpen exams and their associations were good; however, the clinical examination with the Nyvad criteria was sufficient for the diagnosis of interproximal lesions in primary teeth.
本临床研究的目的是评估和比较使用尼瓦德标准的视觉检查(视觉检查 - (VE))、邻面放射摄影(根尖片 - BW)、激光荧光装置(诊断笔 - DIAGNOdent Pen - DDPen)及其联合应用在乳牙邻面病变诊断中的性能。为此,选取了45名年龄在5至9岁之间的儿童(n = 59个牙面),这些儿童的乳牙健康或有提示龋损存在的体征。根据尼瓦德标准对牙面进行临床评估和编码,随后立即使用诊断笔进行评估。仅对尼瓦德评分为2、3、5或6的牙面进行放射摄影检查。以病变深度为参考标准,对有活动龋损和/或表面不连续的病变进行修复。计算每种技术及其联合应用的敏感性、特异性、准确性和ROC曲线下面积。使用尼瓦德标准的视觉检查具有最高的特异性、准确性和ROC曲线下面积值。诊断笔具有最高的敏感性值。与一种或多种方法联合应用可提高特异性。视觉、放射摄影和诊断笔检查及其联合应用的性能良好;然而,使用尼瓦德标准的临床检查足以诊断乳牙邻面病变。