Serban Christa, Lungeanu Diana, Bota Sergiu-David, Cotca Claudia C, Negrutiu Meda Lavinia, Duma Virgil-Florin, Sinescu Cosmin, Craciunescu Emanuela Lidia
School of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
Research Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 28;11(3):674. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030674.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of emerging technologies, such as laser fluorescence (LF), transillumination, light-emitting diode devices, optical coherence tomography (OCT), alternating current impedance spectroscopy, fluorescence cameras (FC), photo-thermal radiometry, and modulated luminescence technology. In vivo and in vitro results of such non-ionizing, non-invasive, and non-destructive methods' effectiveness in non-cavitated dentin caries detection are sometimes ambiguous. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 34 relevant research articles published between 2011-2021 were selected. The risk of bias was assessed with a tool tailored for caries diagnostic studies, and subsequent quantitative uni- and bi-variate meta-analysis was carried out in separate sub-groups according to the investigated surface (occlusal/proximal) and study setting (in vivo/in vitro). In spite of the high heterogeneity across the review groups, in vitro studies on LF and FC proved a good diagnostic ability for the occlusal surface, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.803 (11 studies) and 0.845 (five studies), respectively. OCT studies reported an outstanding performance with an overall AUC = 0.945 (four studies). Promising technologies, such as OCT or FC VistaProof, still need well-designed and well-powered studies to accrue experimental and clinical data for conclusive medical evidence, especially for the proximal surface. Registration: INPLASY202210097.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估新兴技术的诊断准确性,如激光荧光(LF)、透照法、发光二极管设备、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、交流阻抗谱、荧光相机(FC)、光热辐射测量法和调制发光技术。此类非电离、非侵入性和非破坏性方法在非龋洞型牙本质龋检测中的体内和体外有效性结果有时并不明确。按照PRISMA指南,选取了2011年至2021年间发表的34篇相关研究文章。使用专门为龋病诊断研究设计的工具评估偏倚风险,并根据所研究的表面(咬合面/邻面)和研究环境(体内/体外)在不同亚组中进行后续的定量单变量和双变量荟萃分析。尽管各综述组之间存在高度异质性,但LF和FC的体外研究证明对咬合面具有良好的诊断能力,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.803(11项研究)和0.845(5项研究)。OCT研究报告了出色的表现,总体AUC = 0.945(4项研究)。OCT或FC VistaProof等有前景的技术仍需要设计良好且样本量充足的研究来积累实验和临床数据,以获得确凿的医学证据,尤其是对于邻面。注册信息:INPLASY202210097。