Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2020 Apr 25;2020:5282698. doi: 10.1155/2020/5282698. eCollection 2020.
Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting.
A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database from January 2010 through March 2020 about the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious LC or PT was performed. This combination of keywords was used: (A) "PET" OR "positron emission tomography" AND (B) "lung" OR "pulmonary" OR "pleur" AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on PET or PET/CT in patients with suspicious LC or PT were selected.
We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) and other radiotracers taking into account 17 meta-analyses. Evidence-based data demonstrated a good diagnostic performance of F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) or pleural lesions with overall higher sensitivity than specificity. Evidence-based data do not support the routine use of dual time point (DTP) F-FDG PET/CT or fluorine-18 fluorothymidine (F-FLT) PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of SPNs. Even if F-FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity as a selective screening modality for LC, its role in this setting remains unknown.
Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with different radiotracers for suspicious LC or PT are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of F-FDG PET/CT. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
几项荟萃分析报告了使用不同示踪剂的正电子发射断层扫描或正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET 或 PET/CT)在疑似肺癌(LC)或胸膜肿瘤(PT)患者中的诊断性能数据。本文旨在综述这一背景下的最新循证数据。
在 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中全面检索了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月发表的关于使用不同示踪剂的 PET 或 PET/CT 在疑似 LC 或 PT 患者中的诊断性能的荟萃分析,使用了以下关键词组合:(A)“PET”或“正电子发射断层扫描”和(B)“肺”或“pulmonary”或“pleur”和(C)“荟萃分析”。仅选择了关于疑似 LC 或 PT 患者的 PET 或 PET/CT 的荟萃分析。
我们总结了氟-18 氟脱氧葡萄糖(F-FDG)和其他示踪剂的 PET 或 PET/CT 的诊断性能,考虑了 17 项荟萃分析。循证数据表明,F-FDG PET 或 PET/CT 对孤立性肺结节(SPN)或胸膜病变的特征具有良好的诊断性能,总体敏感性高于特异性。循证数据不支持常规使用双时相(DTP)F-FDG PET/CT 或氟-18 氟胸腺嘧啶(F-FLT)PET/CT 进行 SPN 的鉴别诊断。即使 F-FDG PET/CT 作为 LC 的选择性筛查方式具有高敏感性和特异性,但其在这一背景下的作用仍不清楚。
关于使用不同示踪剂的 PET/CT 在疑似 LC 或 PT 中的诊断性能的循证数据正在增加,F-FDG PET/CT 的诊断性能良好。需要更多的前瞻性多中心研究和成本效益分析。