Suppr超能文献

日间手术住院患者全肩关节置换术:一项回顾性队列研究及成本效益分析。

Day case inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Borakati Aditya, Ali Asad, Nagaraj Chetana, Gadikoppula Srinivas, Kurer Michael

机构信息

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital and University College London, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2020 Apr 18;11(4):213-221. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.213.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Day case total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a novel approach, not widely practiced in Europe. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients comparing elective day case and inpatient TSAs in our United Kingdom centre.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of day case TSA compared to standard inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

All patients undergoing TSA between January 2017 and July 2018 were included. Outcome measures were: Change in abduction and extension 3 mo postoperatively; 30-d postoperative adverse events and re-admissions in day case and inpatient groups. We also conducted an economic evaluation of outpatient arthroplasty. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to adjust for demographic and operative covariates.

RESULTS

Fifty nine patients were included, 18 d cases and 41 inpatients. There were no adverse events or re-admissions at 30 d postoperatively in either group. There were no significant differences in adjusted flexion (mean difference 16.4, 95%CI: 17.6-50.5, = 0.337) or abduction (mean difference: 13.2, 95%CI: 18.4-44.9, = 0.405) postoperatively between groups. Median savings with outpatient arthroplasty were £529 (interquartile range: 247.33-789, < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Day case TSA is a safe, effective procedure, with significant cost benefit. Wider use may be warranted in the United Kingdom and beyond, with potential for significant cost savings and improved efficiency.

摘要

背景

日间手术全肩关节置换术(TSA)是一种新方法,在欧洲尚未广泛应用。我们在英国中心对患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较择期日间手术和住院TSA。

目的

评估日间手术TSA与标准住院全肩关节置换术相比的疗效和成本效益。

方法

纳入2017年1月至2018年7月期间接受TSA的所有患者。观察指标为:术后3个月外展和伸展的变化;日间手术组和住院组术后30天的不良事件和再入院情况。我们还对门诊关节置换术进行了经济评估。采用多变量线性和逻辑回归对人口统计学和手术协变量进行调整。

结果

纳入59例患者,18例日间手术患者和41例住院患者。两组术后30天均无不良事件或再入院情况。两组术后调整后的屈曲(平均差异16.4,95%CI:17.6 - 50.5,P = 0.337)或外展(平均差异:13.2,95%CI:18.4 - 44.9,P = 0.40)无显著差异。门诊关节置换术的中位节省费用为529英镑(四分位间距:247.33 - 789,P < 0.0001)。

结论

日间手术TSA是一种安全、有效的手术方法,具有显著的成本效益。在英国及其他地区可能有必要更广泛地应用,有可能大幅节省成本并提高效率。

相似文献

5
Quantification of patient-level costs in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.门诊全肩关节置换术患者层面费用的量化。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jun;28(6):1066-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.006. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
6
Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time.门诊与住院全肩关节置换术随时间的趋势。
JSES Int. 2021 Nov 14;6(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.016. eCollection 2022 Jan.

引用本文的文献

8
Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review.门诊肩关节置换术——一项系统综述
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2021 Jun 25;5:24715492211028025. doi: 10.1177/24715492211028025. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A cost-identification analysis.门诊全肩关节置换术:成本识别分析。
J Orthop. 2018 May 7;15(2):581-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.038. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
Current concepts in anaesthesia for shoulder surgery.肩部手术麻醉的当前概念。
Open Orthop J. 2013 Sep 6;7:323-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010323. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验