Daher Mohammad, Cobvarrubias Oscar, Boufadel Peter, Fares Mohamad Y, Goltz Daniel E, Khan Adam Z, Horneff John G, Abboud Joseph A
Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):151-165. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06364-5. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
In recent years, orthopaedic procedures have increasingly shifted from inpatient to outpatient settings. This trend includes total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), which is being performed more frequently in outpatient facilities and ambulatory surgical centres. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of adverse events between outpatient and inpatient TSA.
PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases were screened for articles comparing outpatient to inpatient TSA through June 2024, using relevant and holistic search terms. Non-comparative articles and those utilizing national databases were excluded from our study. Data on complications, myocardial infarction (MI), thromboembolic events, anaemia/transfusions, infections, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, revision surgery, and patient reported outcome measures at one year (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) were extracted.
A total of 14 articles were included in our study, involving 1070 outpatient and 1330 inpatient TSA patients. Patients in the inpatient group were older and had a higher ASA compared to the patients in the outpatient group. The outpatient TSA group was found to have significantly lower rates of overall complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, p = 0.001), medical complications (OR = 0.43, p < 0.001), and readmissions (OR = 0.47, p = 0.008), as well as higher mean ASES scores (81.4 vs. 78.5, p = 0.01) when compared to the inpatient TSA group. There were no significant differences in rates of ED visits (p = 0.27), revisions (p = 0.06), and VAS scores (p = 0.15) between inpatient and outpatient TSA groups.
TSAs performed in the outpatient setting had a lower rate of overall adverse events, medical complications, readmissions, and a higher ASES score compared to inpatient TSAs. However, since patients in the inpatient group had higher ASA and were older, our results support the safety of the outpatient TSA based on the current selection criteria.
近年来,骨科手术越来越多地从住院环境转向门诊环境。这一趋势包括全肩关节置换术(TSA),该手术在门诊设施和门诊手术中心的开展频率越来越高。本研究的目的是比较门诊和住院TSA的临床结果及不良事件发生率。
通过使用相关且全面的检索词,对PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌学术(第1 - 20页)数据库进行筛选,以查找截至2024年6月比较门诊和住院TSA的文章。非比较性文章以及使用国家数据库的文章被排除在我们的研究之外。提取了关于并发症、心肌梗死(MI)、血栓栓塞事件、贫血/输血、感染、再入院、急诊科(ED)就诊、翻修手术以及患者一年时报告的结局指标(视觉模拟量表[VAS]和美国肩肘外科医师[ASES]评分)的数据。
我们的研究共纳入14篇文章,涉及1070例门诊TSA患者和1330例住院TSA患者。与门诊组患者相比,住院组患者年龄更大且美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级更高。结果发现,门诊TSA组的总体并发症发生率(优势比[OR] = 0.59,p = 0.001)、医疗并发症发生率(OR = 0.43,p < 0.001)和再入院率(OR = 0.47,p = 0.008)显著更低,并且与住院TSA组相比,平均ASES评分更高(81.4对78.5,p = 0.01)。住院和门诊TSA组之间在ED就诊率(p = 0.27)、翻修率(p = 0.06)和VAS评分(p = 0.15)方面没有显著差异。
与住院TSA相比,门诊进行的TSA总体不良事件、医疗并发症、再入院率更低,ASES评分更高。然而,由于住院组患者的ASA分级更高且年龄更大,我们的结果支持基于当前选择标准的门诊TSA的安全性。