Suppr超能文献

门诊肩关节置换术——一项系统综述

Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Allahabadi Sachin, Cheung Edward C, Hodax Jonathan D, Feeley Brian T, Ma Chunbong B, Lansdown Drew A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2021 Jun 25;5:24715492211028025. doi: 10.1177/24715492211028025. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA.

METHODS

A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA.

CONCLUSION

In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.

摘要

目的

近期报告显示,对于经过适当筛选的患者,门诊肩关节置换术(SA)可能是住院治疗的一种安全替代方案。本研究旨在回顾关于门诊SA的文献报道。

方法

对有关门诊SA的出版物进行系统综述。纳入的出版物讨论了在手术当日或术后23小时内出院的患者。文章按照并发症、再入院情况、安全性、患者选择、疼痛管理策略、成本效益以及患者和外科医生满意度等方面进行分类。

结果

共纳入26篇文章。接受门诊SA的患者比接受住院SA的患者更年轻,体重指数更低。大型数据库研究表明,与门诊SA患者相比,住院SA患者出现更多的医疗并发症。关于疼痛管理策略的文章讨论了单次和连续肌间沟阻滞,结果相似。患者和外科医生均报告门诊SA后满意度较高,成本分析研究表明门诊SA可显著节省成本。

结论

对于经过适当筛选的患者,门诊SA可以是一种安全、节省成本的住院治疗替代方案,可能会使患者和医生都高度满意,不过仍需要进一步研究以明确门诊SA的合理应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d588/8492032/6dc355439bfa/10.1177_24715492211028025-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验