Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Oct;49(7):2405-2420. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01717-8. Epub 2020 May 13.
Lesbian and bisexual women may have different levels of sex hormones compared to heterosexual women. We systematically reviewed comparative studies measuring any sex hormones. A protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO-CRD42017072436) and searches conducted in six databases. Any relevant empirical studies published within the last 50 years reporting any circulating sex hormones in sexual minority women compared to heterosexual women were included, with no language or setting restrictions. Inclusions, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of hormone levels, using standardized-mean-differences (SMD) were conducted where five or more studies reported results. From 1236 citations, 24 full papers were examined and 14 studies of mixed designs included, 12 in women without known ovarian problems. Hormones were measured in plasma (n = 9), saliva (n = 4), and urine (n = 2) and included androstenedione, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, pregnanediol, progesterone, testosterone, and several other hormones. Most studies were small, biased, and had considerable heterogeneity. Few found statistically significant differences between groups. All-sample meta-analysis showed increased testosterone in sexual minority women compared to heterosexual women (n = 9; SMD = 0.90; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.22, 1.57, I = 84%). This was the only difference found. We conclude that the small amount of heterogeneous research, from 50 years to date, suggests little discernable difference in sex hormone levels between lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women excepting possibly higher testosterone. A large-scale primary study would be required before placing any certainty in the findings or their implications.
女同性恋和双性恋女性的性激素水平可能与异性恋女性不同。我们系统地回顾了比较研究,这些研究测量了任何性激素。该方案已预先注册(PROSPERO-CRD42017072436),并在六个数据库中进行了搜索。纳入了过去 50 年内发表的任何与异性恋女性相比,报告任何性少数群体女性循环性激素的任何相关实证研究,不限制语言或研究背景。纳入、数据提取和质量评估均由两人进行。如果有五项或更多研究报告了结果,则使用标准化均数差(SMD)进行激素水平的随机效应荟萃分析。从 1236 条引用中,检查了 24 篇全文,并纳入了 14 项混合设计的研究,其中 12 项研究的对象为没有已知卵巢问题的女性。激素测量方法包括血浆(n=9)、唾液(n=4)和尿液(n=2),并包括雄烯二酮、促黄体生成素、雌二醇、孕烷二醇、孕酮、睾丸激素和其他几种激素。大多数研究规模较小、存在偏倚且具有很大的异质性。很少有研究发现组间存在统计学显著差异。所有样本荟萃分析显示,性少数群体女性的睾丸激素水平高于异性恋女性(n=9;SMD=0.90;95%置信区间(CI)0.22,1.57,I=84%)。这是唯一发现的差异。我们得出的结论是,从目前 50 年的研究来看,数量很少且存在异质性的研究表明,女同性恋、双性恋和异性恋女性的性激素水平几乎没有明显差异,除了睾丸激素水平可能较高之外。在对研究结果或其影响有任何确定性之前,需要进行一项大规模的原始研究。