Department of Psychology.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):963-973. doi: 10.1037/pag0000490. Epub 2020 May 14.
This study examined the influence of same-age and mixed-age dyads on the collaborative inhibition effect (reduced recall in collaborative groups compared to the combined recall of the same number people who recall individually). Younger (age 18-25) and older (age 65+) adults recalled categorized word lists alone or in collaboration with a same-age or a different-age partner. On an initial recall test, the magnitude of collaborative inhibition for veridical recall was similar across dyads, regardless of age. However, age differences emerged in false recall as older adults were less likely to correct each other's errors than younger adults in same-age dyads. Older adults in same-age dyads continued to demonstrate greater false recall on a subsequent recall test, but there were no lasting costs of collaboration on subsequent recall or recognition for same-age or mixed-age dyads. Mixed-age dyads were more likely to provide a simple acknowledgment and less likely to remain silent in response to partner suggestions than were same-age partners, however, this did not affect the magnitude of collaborative inhibition. Any lasting effects of collaboration are invariant across same-age and mixed-age partners. The results demonstrate age-invariance of the retrieval strategy disruption theory and highlight collaborative process variables as complementary mechanisms of collaborative inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了同龄和混合年龄对子对合作抑制效应(与相同数量的人单独回忆相比,合作群体的回忆减少)的影响。年轻(18-25 岁)和年长(65+岁)成年人单独或与同龄或不同龄的伙伴合作回忆分类单词列表。在初始回忆测试中,无论年龄如何,真实回忆的合作抑制程度在各个对子中都相似。然而,在错误回忆中出现了年龄差异,因为与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人在同龄对子中不太可能纠正彼此的错误。在随后的回忆测试中,同龄对子中的年长成年人继续表现出更高的错误回忆,但对于同龄或混合年龄对子来说,合作对随后的回忆或识别没有持久的影响。与同龄伙伴相比,混合年龄对子更有可能简单地承认,而不太可能在回应伙伴的建议时保持沉默,然而,这并没有影响合作抑制的程度。任何合作的持久影响在同龄和混合年龄伙伴中都是不变的。研究结果表明,检索策略干扰理论具有年龄不变性,并强调合作过程变量是合作抑制的互补机制。