Wei Yunfeng, Charbonneau Brooke Z, Meade Michelle L, Hutchison Keith A
Montana State University, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 173440, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):820-831. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01609-5. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
In the current study, we investigated how long the effects of one single collaboration session continue to influence individual memory. Participants learned categorized word lists and prose passages individually, and then they were instructed to recall learned materials either collaboratively or individually. Following initial recall, participants completed an individual recall test after a delay of 5 min, 48 h, or 1 week. On the initial recall test, we found that collaboration reduced recall of correct items on both word lists and prose passages (collaborative inhibition), and that collaboration reduced false recall on both word lists and prose passages (error correction). However, on the subsequent individual memory test after a delay, the pattern of post collaborative effects differed across veridical and false recall. For both word lists and prose passages, post collaborative benefits on correct recall lasted 1 week. However, there were no lasting effects of error correction on subsequent false recall. These results suggest that the time course of post collaborative benefits can be long lasting, but they are selective to veridical recall. The results are explained by theories of reexposure and error correction.
在当前研究中,我们调查了单次合作学习环节的效果会持续多长时间影响个体记忆。参与者分别学习分类单词列表和散文段落,然后他们被指示以合作或单独的方式回忆所学材料。在初次回忆之后,参与者在延迟5分钟、48小时或1周后完成个体回忆测试。在初次回忆测试中,我们发现合作减少了单词列表和散文段落上正确项目的回忆(合作抑制),并且合作减少了单词列表和散文段落上的错误回忆(错误纠正)。然而,在延迟后的后续个体记忆测试中,合作后效果的模式在真实回忆和错误回忆方面有所不同。对于单词列表和散文段落,合作后对正确回忆的益处持续1周。然而,错误纠正对后续错误回忆没有持久影响。这些结果表明,合作后益处的时间进程可能是持久的,但它们对真实回忆具有选择性。这些结果由再暴露和错误纠正理论进行解释。