• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2007-2012 年与 2013-2017 年相比, 和 种属中抗生素耐药性的趋势和影响。

Trends and Impact in Antimicrobial Resistance Among and Species in 2007-2012 Compared to 2013-2017.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Medical Microbiology, The Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Microb Drug Resist. 2020 Dec;26(12):1452-1457. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0462. Epub 2020 May 14.

DOI:10.1089/mdr.2019.0462
PMID:32407191
Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the susceptibility of and spp. strains, isolated from patients hospitalized in the clinical hospital in Poland to penicillin, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, imipenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole. We analyzed susceptibility of 476 isolates to routinely use for the treatment of anaerobic bacterial infections antibiotics. test method was used to determining the minimal inhibitory concentration values. To show the trend of drug resistance, we compared data from two periods within the years 2003-2017. Research results indicate that the problem of resistance is mainly related to strains belonging to non-fragilis . In the analyzed periods, there was an increase in the percentage of clindamycin-resistant isolates (35.21% vs. 53.33%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (2.83% vs. 8.15%), and imipenem (1.41% vs. 3.7%). In isolates belonging to , we observed a constant high (∼50%) percentage of clindamycin-resistant strains. The overwhelming majority of strains were resistant to penicillin (>95%) and about 20% of the isolates were not susceptible to clindamycin. Clindamycin, due to the high and increasing percentage of resistant strains, may not be a good choice in the empirical therapy of infections caused by and . Our study highlighted the importance of a routine or at least periodic monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli, providing important information for appropriate therapy. The study shows that infection caused (or suspected of being caused) by and spp. can be empirically treated with metronidazole or imipenem.

摘要

本研究旨在分析从波兰临床医院住院患者中分离出的 和 spp. 菌株对青霉素、阿莫西林克拉维酸、亚胺培南、克林霉素和甲硝唑的敏感性。我们分析了 476 株分离株对常用于治疗厌氧细菌感染的抗生素的敏感性。采用 检测法测定最小抑菌浓度值。为了显示耐药趋势,我们比较了 2003-2017 年两个时期的数据。研究结果表明,耐药问题主要与非脆弱 菌株有关。在分析的两个时期内,克林霉素耐药分离株的百分比(35.21%比 53.33%)、阿莫西林/克拉维酸(2.83%比 8.15%)和亚胺培南(1.41%比 3.7%)均有所增加。在属于 的分离株中,我们观察到克林霉素耐药菌株的比例一直很高(约 50%)。绝大多数 菌株对青霉素耐药(>95%),约 20%的分离株对克林霉素不敏感。克林霉素由于耐药菌株的比例高且不断增加,可能不是治疗 和 感染的经验性治疗的理想选择。我们的研究强调了定期监测厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌的抗菌药物敏感性的重要性,为合理治疗提供了重要信息。研究表明,由 或 引起(或疑似由 引起)的感染可以经验性地用甲硝唑或亚胺培南治疗。

相似文献

1
Trends and Impact in Antimicrobial Resistance Among and Species in 2007-2012 Compared to 2013-2017.2007-2012 年与 2013-2017 年相比, 和 种属中抗生素耐药性的趋势和影响。
Microb Drug Resist. 2020 Dec;26(12):1452-1457. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0462. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
In vitro effect of clindamycin against Bacteroides and Parabacteroides isolates in Poland.波兰体外克林霉素对拟杆菌属和副拟杆菌属分离株的作用。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018 Jun;13:49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
3
Resistance of Bacteroides isolates recovered among clinical samples from a major Costa Rican hospital between 2000 and 2008 to ß-lactams, clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol.2000年至2008年间,从哥斯达黎加一家主要医院的临床样本中分离出的拟杆菌对β-内酰胺类、克林霉素、甲硝唑和氯霉素的耐药性。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2012 Dec;25(4):261-5.
4
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Anaerobic Bacterial Clinical Isolates From 2014 to 2016, Including Recently Named or Renamed Species.2014 年至 2016 年临床分离的厌氧细菌的抗菌药物敏感性模式,包括最近命名或更名的菌种。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 Mar;39(2):190-199. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.2.190.
5
Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of multidrug-resistant Bacteroides, Parabacteroides spp., and Pseudoflavonifractor from a Costa Rican hospital.来自哥斯达黎加一家医院的耐多药拟杆菌属、副拟杆菌属和假黄单胞菌属的表型和基因型特征
Microb Drug Resist. 2014 Oct;20(5):478-84. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2013.0180. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong by the tentative EUCAST disc diffusion method.采用暂行的欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)纸片扩散法检测香港地区脆弱拟杆菌群微生物的抗菌药物敏感性。
Anaerobe. 2017 Oct;47:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
7
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong, 2020-2021.2020-2021 年香港脆弱拟杆菌群细菌的抗菌药物敏感性。
Anaerobe. 2023 Aug;82:102756. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102756. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
8
[ESBL-positive strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolated from patients at the regional hospital center in Płock (Poland)].[从波兰普沃茨克地区医院中心患者中分离出的脆弱拟杆菌群超广谱β-内酰胺酶阳性菌株]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2004;56(3):245-53.
9
Resistance trends of Bacteroides fragilis group over an 8-year period, 1997-2004, in Korea.1997年至2004年韩国8年间脆弱拟杆菌群的耐药趋势
Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Aug;29(4):293-8. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.4.293.
10
Detection of resistance genes and susceptibility patterns in Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains.检测拟杆菌属和副拟杆菌属菌株中的耐药基因和药敏模式。
Anaerobe. 2010 Jun;16(3):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic potential of in gastrointestinal and hepatic disease.[具体物质]在胃肠和肝脏疾病中的治疗潜力。 (原文中“in”前面缺少具体内容,这里用“[具体物质]”代替以便完整表达意思)
MedComm (2020). 2024 Dec 16;5(12):e70017. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70017. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
An Insider's Perspective about the Pathogenic Relevance of Gut Bacterial Transportomes.肠道细菌转运组学的发病相关性:知情人视角
Microb Physiol. 2024;34(1):133-141. doi: 10.1159/000538779. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Prolonged infection in a patient with multiple lung abscesses.一名患有多发性肺脓肿患者的长期感染。
Respirol Case Rep. 2024 Mar 7;12(3):e01314. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.1314. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Distribution, Trends, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of , , , and Species Causing Bacteremia in Japan During 2011-2020: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on National Surveillance Data.2011 - 2020年日本引起菌血症的[具体菌种,原文未完整列出]菌种的分布、趋势及药敏情况:基于全国监测数据的回顾性观察研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 3;10(7):ofad334. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad334. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Recent Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Anaerobic Clinical Isolates.厌氧临床分离株中抗菌药物耐药性的最新趋势
Microorganisms. 2023 Jun 1;11(6):1474. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061474.
6
Non-odontogenic maxillofacial infections - a 17-years retrospective cohort study.非牙源性颌面部感染-一项 17 年回顾性队列研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;28(1):425-434. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01162-6. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
7
Phenotypic and genotypic identification of carbapenem resistance in Bacteroides fragilis clinical strains.脆弱拟杆菌临床分离株碳青霉烯类耐药的表型和基因型鉴定。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Jun;212(3):231-240. doi: 10.1007/s00430-023-00765-w. Epub 2023 May 13.
8
Gut Microbiota in Nutrition and Health with a Special Focus on Specific Bacterial Clusters.肠道微生物群在营养与健康中的作用,特别关注特定细菌簇。
Cells. 2022 Sep 30;11(19):3091. doi: 10.3390/cells11193091.
9
Time for Some Group Therapy: Update on Identification, Antimicrobial Resistance, Taxonomy, and Clinical Significance of the Bacteroides fragilis Group.是时候进行一些小组治疗了:脆弱拟杆菌群的鉴定、抗菌耐药性、分类学和临床意义的最新进展。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Sep 21;60(9):e0236120. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02361-20. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Oral Isolates of spp.临床分离的 spp. 菌株的抗菌药敏性
Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):125. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010125.