University of Patras, Department of Business Administration, Greece.
University of Patras, Department of Business Administration, Greece.
Waste Manag. 2020 May 15;109:181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055. Epub 2020 May 11.
The scope of this research is to present a more holistic approach on measuring countries' performance in managing and exploiting their Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). Specifically, we argue that relying solely on criteria like the recycling and/or the cyclical material use rate, can lead to an overestimation or underestimation of countries' true performance. That is because the level of waste generation is left unaccounted, despite the fact that low waste generation is an important environmental target, and so is the countries' true potential, as it is reflected by their economic and social progress. Instead, we measure the environmental and circular economy performance of 26 European Union countries by implementing Data Envelopment Analysis and tackle the aforementioned problem by using the generated quantity of MSW per capita and the three dimensions of the Social Progress Index as inputs and the recycling and/or the cyclical material use rate as outputs. We do so, using a basic framework and a framework that imposes common weights to enforce a full ranking of the countries. Our study shows large disparities among European countries, with respect to their performance. Interestingly though, the borders between Western and Eastern Europe have fallen, but not those between the north and the south: old EU members, such as Spain or France, perform significantly worst, both from an environmental and a circular economy perspective, than newer members, such as Slovenia or Poland. Finally, Belgium has been revealed as the best performer, both from an environmental and a cyclical economy perspective.
本研究的范围是提出一种更全面的方法来衡量各国在管理和利用城市固体废物(MSW)方面的表现。具体来说,我们认为仅依赖于回收和/或循环材料利用率等标准,可能会导致对国家真实表现的高估或低估。这是因为没有考虑到废物产生的水平,尽管低废物产生是一个重要的环境目标,而且国家的真实潜力也是如此,因为它反映了其经济和社会的进步。相反,我们通过实施数据包络分析来衡量 26 个欧盟国家的环境和循环经济绩效,并通过使用人均 MSW 产生量和社会进步指数的三个维度作为投入,以及回收和/或循环材料利用率作为产出来解决上述问题。我们使用基本框架和强制国家全面排名的共同权重框架来实现这一目标。我们的研究表明,欧洲国家之间在绩效方面存在很大差异。有趣的是,尽管东欧和西欧之间的界限已经消失,但北欧和南欧之间的界限并没有消失:西班牙或法国等老牌欧盟成员国在环境和循环经济方面的表现明显不如斯洛文尼亚或波兰等新成员国。最后,比利时被证明是在环境和循环经济方面表现最好的国家。