• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于环境和循环经济绩效对欧洲国家进行排名:在 MSW 中的 DEA 应用。

Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: A DEA application in MSW.

机构信息

University of Patras, Department of Business Administration, Greece.

University of Patras, Department of Business Administration, Greece.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2020 May 15;109:181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055. Epub 2020 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055
PMID:32408101
Abstract

The scope of this research is to present a more holistic approach on measuring countries' performance in managing and exploiting their Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). Specifically, we argue that relying solely on criteria like the recycling and/or the cyclical material use rate, can lead to an overestimation or underestimation of countries' true performance. That is because the level of waste generation is left unaccounted, despite the fact that low waste generation is an important environmental target, and so is the countries' true potential, as it is reflected by their economic and social progress. Instead, we measure the environmental and circular economy performance of 26 European Union countries by implementing Data Envelopment Analysis and tackle the aforementioned problem by using the generated quantity of MSW per capita and the three dimensions of the Social Progress Index as inputs and the recycling and/or the cyclical material use rate as outputs. We do so, using a basic framework and a framework that imposes common weights to enforce a full ranking of the countries. Our study shows large disparities among European countries, with respect to their performance. Interestingly though, the borders between Western and Eastern Europe have fallen, but not those between the north and the south: old EU members, such as Spain or France, perform significantly worst, both from an environmental and a circular economy perspective, than newer members, such as Slovenia or Poland. Finally, Belgium has been revealed as the best performer, both from an environmental and a cyclical economy perspective.

摘要

本研究的范围是提出一种更全面的方法来衡量各国在管理和利用城市固体废物(MSW)方面的表现。具体来说,我们认为仅依赖于回收和/或循环材料利用率等标准,可能会导致对国家真实表现的高估或低估。这是因为没有考虑到废物产生的水平,尽管低废物产生是一个重要的环境目标,而且国家的真实潜力也是如此,因为它反映了其经济和社会的进步。相反,我们通过实施数据包络分析来衡量 26 个欧盟国家的环境和循环经济绩效,并通过使用人均 MSW 产生量和社会进步指数的三个维度作为投入,以及回收和/或循环材料利用率作为产出来解决上述问题。我们使用基本框架和强制国家全面排名的共同权重框架来实现这一目标。我们的研究表明,欧洲国家之间在绩效方面存在很大差异。有趣的是,尽管东欧和西欧之间的界限已经消失,但北欧和南欧之间的界限并没有消失:西班牙或法国等老牌欧盟成员国在环境和循环经济方面的表现明显不如斯洛文尼亚或波兰等新成员国。最后,比利时被证明是在环境和循环经济方面表现最好的国家。

相似文献

1
Ranking European countries on the basis of their environmental and circular economy performance: A DEA application in MSW.基于环境和循环经济绩效对欧洲国家进行排名:在 MSW 中的 DEA 应用。
Waste Manag. 2020 May 15;109:181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Introduction of the circular economy within developing regions: A comparative analysis of advantages and opportunities for waste valorization.发展中地区的循环经济介绍:废物增值利用的优势和机会比较分析。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 15;230:366-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.095. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Concept of sustainable waste management in the city of Zagreb: Towards the implementation of circular economy approach.萨格勒布市可持续废物管理概念:迈向循环经济方法的实施
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017 Feb;67(2):241-259. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1229700.
4
Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management.废物管理中循环经济的废物层次指数。
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Management of aluminium packaging waste in selected European countries.部分欧洲国家的铝包装废物管理
Waste Manag Res. 2019 Apr;37(4):357-364. doi: 10.1177/0734242X19832368. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
6
Are deposit-refund systems effective in managing glass packaging? State of the art and future directions in Europe.押金退款系统在管理玻璃包装方面是否有效?欧洲的最新技术和未来发展方向。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158256. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158256. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Municipal solid waste prevention: A review of market-based instruments in six European Union countries.城市固体废物预防:六个欧盟国家基于市场的工具综述。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 May;38(1_suppl):3-22. doi: 10.1177/0734242X19894622. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
8
Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management.城市固体废物物流管理的研究挑战。
Waste Manag. 2016 Feb;48:584-592. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.025. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Designing a fuzzy decision support framework for assessing solid waste management in the South European region.设计一个模糊决策支持框架,用于评估南欧地区的固体废物管理。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(28):42862-42882. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18891-y. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
10
Evaluation of economies of scale in eco-efficiency of municipal waste management: an empirical approach for Chile.评估城市废物管理生态效率的规模经济:智利的实证方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(22):28337-28348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12529-1. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental quality assessment and spatial spillover effects of three urban agglomerations in China: A Meta-EBM approach.中国三大城市群的环境质量评估及空间溢出效应:一种Meta-EBM方法
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 9;9(8):e19028. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19028. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Waste metrics in the framework of circular economy.循环经济框架中的废物指标。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Dec;41(12):1741-1753. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231190794. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Assessment of national circular economy performance using super-efficiency dual data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index: Case study of 27 European countries.
运用超效率双数据 envelopment 分析和 Malmquist 生产率指数评估国家循环经济绩效:以 27 个欧洲国家为例
Heliyon. 2023 May 29;9(6):e16584. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16584. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
A Critical Review of EU Key Indicators for the Transition to the Circular Economy.对向循环经济转型的欧盟关键指标的批判性回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 22;18(16):8840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168840.