Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Iran.
Department of Remote Sensing & GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Iran; Department of Geography, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 1;724:138319. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138319. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
Accurate information on soil moisture (SM) is critical in various applications including agriculture, climate, hydrology, soil and drought. In this paper, various predictive relationships including regression (Multiple Linear Regression, MLR), machine learning (Random Forest, RF; Triangular regression, Tr) and spatial modeling (Inverse Distance Weighing, IDW and Ordinary kriging, OK) approaches were compared to estimate SM in a semi-arid mountainous watershed. In developing predictive relationship, Remote Sensing datasets including Landsat 8 satellite imagery derived surface biophysical characteristic, ASTER digital elevation model (DEM) derived surface topographical characteristic, climatic data recorded at the synoptic station and in situ SM data measured at Landsat 8 overpass time were utilized, while in spatial modeling, point-based SM measurements were interpolated. While 70%(calibration set) of the measured SM data were used for modeling, 30%(validation set) were used to evaluate modeling accuracy. Finally, the SM uncertainty maps were created for different models based on a bootstrapping approach. Among the environmental parameter sets, land surface temperature (LST) showed the highest impact on the spatial distribution of SM in the region at all dates. Mean R(RMSE) between measured and modeled SM on three dates obtained from the MLR, RF, IDW, OK, and Tr models were 0.70(1.97%), 0.72(1.92%), 0.59(2.38%), 0.59(2.27%) and 0.71(1.99%), respectively. The results showed that RF and IDW produced the highest and lowest performance in SM modeling, respectively. Generally, the performance of RS-based models was higher than interpolation models for estimating SM due to the influence from combination of topographic parameters and surface biophysical characteristics. Modeled SM uncertainty with different models varies in the study area. The highest uncertainty in SM modeling was observed at the north part of the study area where the surface heterogeneity is high. Using RS data increased the accuracy of SM modeling because they can capture the surface biophysical characteristics and topographical properties heterogeneity.
准确的土壤湿度(SM)信息在农业、气候、水文、土壤和干旱等各个领域都至关重要。本文比较了各种预测关系,包括回归(多元线性回归,MLR)、机器学习(随机森林,RF;三角回归,Tr)和空间建模(反距离加权,IDW 和普通克里金,OK)方法,以估计半干旱山区流域的 SM。在开发预测关系时,利用了包括 Landsat 8 卫星图像衍生的表面生物物理特征、ASTER 数字高程模型(DEM)衍生的表面地形特征、气象站记录的气候数据以及 Landsat 8 过境时测量的原位 SM 数据在内的遥感数据集,而在空间建模中,采用基于点的 SM 测量值进行插值。在将 70%(校准集)的实测 SM 数据用于建模的同时,将 30%(验证集)用于评估建模精度。最后,根据自举方法为不同模型创建了 SM 不确定性图。在环境参数集中,在所有日期,地表温度(LST)对该地区 SM 空间分布的影响最大。MLR、RF、IDW、OK 和 Tr 模型在三个日期上测量的 SM 与模型的平均 R(RMSE)分别为 0.70(1.97%)、0.72(1.92%)、0.59(2.38%)、0.59(2.27%)和 0.71(1.99%)。结果表明,RF 和 IDW 在 SM 建模中表现最好和最差。一般来说,由于地形参数和表面生物物理特征的综合影响,基于 RS 的模型在估计 SM 方面的性能优于插值模型。不同模型的 SM 不确定性在研究区域内有所不同。在研究区域的北部,表面异质性较高,SM 建模的不确定性最大。使用 RS 数据提高了 SM 建模的准确性,因为它们可以捕捉表面生物物理特征和地形属性的异质性。