Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Fertil Steril. 2020 Jun;113(6):1242-1250.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 May 11.
To evaluate if there are differences in standardized testing results at the end of third grade between children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and those conceived spontaneously.
Retrospective population-based cohort.
Texas public school system.
PATIENT(S): Singleton and twin children 8-9 years of age who took the third-grade public school standardized testing in Texas from 2012 to 2018.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standardized testing in reading and mathematics.
RESULT(S): After exclusions, there were 6,970 IVF and 12,690 non-IVF children with reading scores and 6,973 IVF and 12,729 non-IVF children with mathematics scores. IVF children scored significantly higher in reading (singletons: 1,543 ± 2 vs. 1,525 ± 1; twins: 1,534 ± 2 vs. 1,504 ± 5 [mean ± SE]), and mathematics (singletons: 1,566 ± 2 vs. 1,550 ± 1; twins: 1,557 ± 2 vs. 1,529 ± 5). Children of mothers ≥30 years of age scored consistently higher than children of mothers 18-29 years of age. The differences were of similar magnitude between IVF and control children for older ages, but not significant for IVF. Within the IVF group, there were no significant differences between children born from fresh versus froze-thawed embryos.
CONCLUSION(S): Children of ages 8-9 years who were conceived with the use of IVF performed as well on third-grade reading and math assessments as their counterparts who were conceived spontaneously. We also found consistent racial and ethnic differences, gender differences, and beneficial effects of older maternal age. Because we were not able to adjust adequately for socioeconomic status and other confounding factors, which may explain some of the observed differences, we conclude that there is no negative effect of IVF conception on academic achievement in third grade.
评估在三年级结束时,通过体外受精(IVF)受孕的儿童与自然受孕的儿童在标准化测试结果上是否存在差异。
回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
德克萨斯州公立学校系统。
2012 年至 2018 年在德克萨斯州参加三年级公立学校标准化考试的 8-9 岁单胎和双胎儿童。
无。
阅读和数学的标准化测试成绩。
排除后,有 6970 名 IVF 儿童和 12690 名非-IVF 儿童的阅读成绩,6973 名 IVF 儿童和 12729 名非-IVF 儿童的数学成绩。IVF 儿童的阅读成绩显著更高(单胎:1543±2 分比 1525±1 分;双胞胎:1534±2 分比 1504±5 分[平均值±SE]),数学成绩也更高(单胎:1566±2 分比 1550±1 分;双胞胎:1557±2 分比 1529±5 分)。母亲年龄≥30 岁的儿童得分始终高于母亲年龄 18-29 岁的儿童。对于年龄较大的儿童,IVF 儿童和对照组儿童之间的差异幅度相似,但 IVF 儿童的差异无统计学意义。在 IVF 组内,新鲜胚胎与冷冻解冻胚胎出生的儿童之间没有显著差异。
年龄在 8-9 岁之间通过 IVF 受孕的儿童在三年级阅读和数学评估中的表现与自然受孕的儿童相当。我们还发现了一致的种族和民族差异、性别差异以及母亲年龄较大的有益影响。由于我们无法充分调整社会经济地位和其他混杂因素,这可能解释了部分观察到的差异,因此我们得出结论,IVF 受孕对三年级的学业成绩没有负面影响。