• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定土地利用决策中生物多样性保护和生态系统服务提供之间的权衡。

Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions.

机构信息

Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):7971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64668-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-64668-z
PMID:32409694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7224365/
Abstract

Sustainable land-use management must account for the potential trade-offs between biodiversity conservation, productive land uses and ecosystem services. In this study, we used Marxan with Zones to generate land use plans that optimize conservation, farming and forestry land uses to reach biodiversity targets while minimizing the opportunity cost for local communities in an inhabited but data-poor National Park in the Andes of Bolivia. Based on six alternative land-use plans, we identified the synergies and trade-offs between the biodiversity benefits achieved in the different plans and the delivery of four locally important water-related ecosystem services modeled with the web-based tool AguAAndes. Although we find synergies between the conservation of high altitude Polylepis woodlands and their associated avifauna and three of the ecosystem services investigated, soil erosion levels were actually higher in scenarios with higher achieved biodiversity benefits. Our study shows how systematic conservation planning and ecosystem service delivery modelling can be used to solve land-use conflicts and identify trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in a data-poor tropical area.

摘要

可持续土地利用管理必须考虑到生物多样性保护、土地生产利用和生态系统服务之间的潜在权衡。在这项研究中,我们使用 Marxan with Zones 生成土地利用规划,以优化保护、农业和林业用地的利用,在玻利维亚安第斯山脉一个有人居住但数据匮乏的国家公园内,实现生物多样性目标,同时使当地社区的机会成本最小化。基于六个替代土地利用计划,我们确定了不同计划中实现的生物多样性效益与通过基于网络的 AguAAndes 工具模拟的四项与水有关的本地重要生态系统服务之间的协同作用和权衡。尽管我们发现高海拔 Polylepis 林地及其相关鸟类与所研究的三个生态系统服务之间存在协同作用,但在实现更高生物多样性效益的情景中,土壤侵蚀水平实际上更高。我们的研究表明,如何在数据匮乏的热带地区,通过系统的保护规划和生态系统服务提供模型,解决土地利用冲突,确定生物多样性保护和生态系统服务之间的权衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/29c15d9cedbd/41598_2020_64668_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/2685cc1a95c3/41598_2020_64668_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/f259d141af38/41598_2020_64668_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/c7feed387290/41598_2020_64668_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/e6c3a3c01423/41598_2020_64668_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/494f3f71c549/41598_2020_64668_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/29c15d9cedbd/41598_2020_64668_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/2685cc1a95c3/41598_2020_64668_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/f259d141af38/41598_2020_64668_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/c7feed387290/41598_2020_64668_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/e6c3a3c01423/41598_2020_64668_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/494f3f71c549/41598_2020_64668_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fa/7224365/29c15d9cedbd/41598_2020_64668_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions.确定土地利用决策中生物多样性保护和生态系统服务提供之间的权衡。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):7971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64668-z.
2
Using Optimal Land-Use Scenarios to Assess Trade-Offs between Conservation, Development, and Social Values.利用最优土地利用情景评估保护、发展和社会价值之间的权衡。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158350. eCollection 2016.
3
Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa.保护南非小卡鲁的生物多样性和生态系统服务。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):1021-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01442.x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
4
Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services.设计绿色基础设施网络,以提高保护区的保护价值并维持生态系统服务。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):541-550. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.164. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses.将国家木材消耗与全球生物多样性和生态系统服务损失联系起来。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:985-994. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.078. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
6
Land use efficiency: anticipating future demand for land-sector greenhouse gas emissions abatement and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water, and biodiversity.土地利用效率:预测土地部门温室气体减排的未来需求,并管理与农业、水和生物多样性的权衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Nov;21(11):4098-114. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13020. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
7
The role of trade-offs in biodiversity conservation planning: linking local management, regional planning and global conservation efforts.权衡在生物多样性保护规划中的作用:连接地方管理、区域规划和全球保护努力。
J Biosci. 2002 Jul;27(4 Suppl 2):393-407. doi: 10.1007/BF02704968.
8
Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.生态系统服务和机会成本改变了保护森林生物多样性的空间优先次序。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112557. eCollection 2014.
9
Evaluation of ecosystem services from 2000 to 2020 and their trade-offs/synergies in a coalfield: a case study in the Pingshuo mining area of the Loess Plateau, China.2000年至2020年煤田生态系统服务评估及其权衡/协同关系:以中国黄土高原平朔矿区为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):36680-36691. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24820-w. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
10
Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.将生态系统服务权衡与稻田到旱地决策相结合:以中国西南洱海流域为例的情景方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:849-860. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.340. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the driving mechanism path of ecosystem service relationships based on the social-ecological system framework.基于社会-生态系统框架探索生态系统服务关系的驱动机制路径。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94352-z.
2
Identifying corridors of river recovery in coastal NSW Australia, for use in river management decision support and prioritisation systems.识别澳大利亚新南威尔士州沿海地区河流恢复的廊道,用于河流管理决策支持和优先级系统。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 23;17(6):e0270285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270285. eCollection 2022.