• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社会-生态系统框架探索生态系统服务关系的驱动机制路径。

Exploring the driving mechanism path of ecosystem service relationships based on the social-ecological system framework.

作者信息

Zhang Yushuo, Liu Boyu, Shi Baoguo, Bi Xu, Mao Yuting, Sui Renjing

机构信息

School of Culture Tourism and Journalism Arts (Humanities Education Center), Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, 030006, China.

College of Geological and Surveying Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technoloy, Taiyuan, 030021, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94352-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-94352-z
PMID:40133335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11937559/
Abstract

Understanding the driving mechanisms behind ecosystem service (ES) trade-offs and synergies is crucial for sustainable ecosystem management. This study integrates the Social-Ecological System Framework (SESF) with path analysis to explore the relationships among crop production (CP), water retention (WR), and soil conservation (SC) in Shanxi Province, China. We identified six key driving factors-annual mean temperature (Tem), total annual precipitation (Pre), Net Primary Productivity (NPP), per capita GDP (GDP), agricultural, forestry, and water fiscal expenditure (Exp), and urban and rural per capita disposable income (Inc)-to analyze their direct and indirect influences on ES interactions over the years 2000, 2010, and 2020. Results show that CP and WR exhibit a persistent trade-off, while CP and SC maintain a synergistic relationship. WR and SC display a trade-off in static time points but shift towards synergy in long-term changes. Path analysis confirms that natural factors (Tem, Pre, and NPP) dominate short-term ES dynamics, whereas socio-economic variables (GDP, Exp, and Inc) play a greater role in long-term ES changes. Mediation analysis reveals that NPP partially mediates climate effects on ESs, while Inc mediates the influence of GDP on ESs. However, Exp does not significantly affect ESs through Inc, likely due to policy implementation delays and regional economic priorities. Findings suggest that spatially targeted policies should be implemented to optimize ES relationships. Long-term ES governance should integrate ecological restoration strategies with socio-economic incentives to enhance ES sustainability.

摘要

了解生态系统服务(ES)权衡与协同背后的驱动机制对于可持续生态系统管理至关重要。本研究将社会-生态系统框架(SESF)与路径分析相结合,以探讨中国山西省作物生产(CP)、保水(WR)和土壤保持(SC)之间的关系。我们确定了六个关键驱动因素——年平均温度(Tem)、年总降水量(Pre)、净初级生产力(NPP)、人均国内生产总值(GDP)、农业、林业和水利财政支出(Exp)以及城乡人均可支配收入(Inc)——来分析它们在2000年、2010年和2020年对生态系统服务相互作用的直接和间接影响。结果表明,作物生产和保水呈现持续的权衡关系,而作物生产和土壤保持保持协同关系。保水和土壤保持在静态时间点呈现权衡关系,但在长期变化中转向协同关系。路径分析证实,自然因素(温度、降水和净初级生产力)主导短期生态系统服务动态,而社会经济变量(国内生产总值、支出和收入)在长期生态系统服务变化中发挥更大作用。中介分析表明,净初级生产力部分介导了气候对生态系统服务的影响,而收入介导了国内生产总值对生态系统服务的影响。然而,支出并未通过收入对生态系统服务产生显著影响,这可能是由于政策实施延迟和区域经济优先事项所致。研究结果表明,应实施空间针对性政策以优化生态系统服务关系。长期的生态系统服务治理应将生态恢复策略与社会经济激励措施相结合,以提高生态系统服务的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/de68ee7e0c35/41598_2025_94352_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/12c93ee901fb/41598_2025_94352_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/8f24c007c7aa/41598_2025_94352_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/a9d71b423148/41598_2025_94352_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/68e602210a95/41598_2025_94352_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/636b1601f353/41598_2025_94352_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/af872c09c614/41598_2025_94352_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/9d7f0b0fc378/41598_2025_94352_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/c64030ae5658/41598_2025_94352_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/de68ee7e0c35/41598_2025_94352_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/12c93ee901fb/41598_2025_94352_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/8f24c007c7aa/41598_2025_94352_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/a9d71b423148/41598_2025_94352_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/68e602210a95/41598_2025_94352_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/636b1601f353/41598_2025_94352_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/af872c09c614/41598_2025_94352_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/9d7f0b0fc378/41598_2025_94352_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/c64030ae5658/41598_2025_94352_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cb0/11937559/de68ee7e0c35/41598_2025_94352_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the driving mechanism path of ecosystem service relationships based on the social-ecological system framework.基于社会-生态系统框架探索生态系统服务关系的驱动机制路径。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94352-z.
2
Multiscale ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs and their driving mechanisms in the Han River Basin, China: implications for watershed management.中国汉江流域多尺度生态系统服务协同/权衡及其驱动机制:对流域管理的启示
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):43440-43454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25248-6. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Spatiotemporal characteristics and drivers of ecosystem service interactions in the Dongting Lake Basin.洞庭湖流域生态系统服务相互作用的时空特征及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:172012. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172012. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Integrated trade-offs/synergies and interactions approach to quantifying the direct and indirect effects of environmental factors on ecosystem services.用于量化环境因素对生态系统服务直接和间接影响的综合权衡/协同作用及相互作用方法。
Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;75(8):1994-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02171-9. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
5
Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table.识别生态系统服务包以及高地下水位采煤区权衡和协同作用的时空特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 3):151036. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151036. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Spatio-temporal dynamics and socio-ecological determinants of ecosystem service interplays in Shandong Province's coastal region (2000-2020): Implications for environmental protection and sustainable ecosystem management.山东省沿海地区(2000-2020 年)生态系统服务相互作用的时空动态及社会生态决定因素:对环境保护和可持续生态系统管理的启示。
Environ Res. 2024 Feb 15;243:117824. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117824. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
7
Spatial and temporal effect and driving factors of ecosystem service trade-off in the Qingjiang River Basin, China.中国清江流域生态系统服务权衡的时空效应及驱动因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Apr;34(4):1051-1062. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202304.022.
8
Spatiotemporal effects of landscape structure on the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem service functions in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.中国长江经济带景观结构对生态系统服务功能之间权衡与协同作用的时空效应
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99295-z.
9
Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China.模拟未来气候变化和生态恢复对中国两个生态保护区和三个生态带生态系统服务权衡与协同的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217849.
10
Spatial heterogeneity and management challenges of ecosystem service trade-offs: a case study in Guangdong Province, China.生态系统服务权衡的空间异质性与管理挑战:以中国广东省为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;73(2):378-394. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01851-8. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring spatial-temporal driving factors for changes in multiple ecosystem services and their relationships in West Liao River Basin, China.探索中国西辽河流域多种生态系统服务变化的时空驱动因素及其关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166716. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166716. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Quantifying the impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on ecosystem service scarcity value in Qinghai, China.量化中国青海“退耕还林”工程对生态服务稀缺价值的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 20;13(1):2927. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29937-7.
3
Ecosystem service trade-offs and spatial non-stationary responses to influencing factors in the Loess hilly-gully region: Lanzhou City, China.
黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统服务权衡及其对影响因素的空间非平稳响应:以兰州市为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157422. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157422. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Spatial relationships between ecosystem services and socioecological drivers across a large-scale region: A case study in the Yellow River Basin.生态系统服务与大尺度区域社会生态驱动因子的空间关系:以黄河流域为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 20;766:142480. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142480. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
5
Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions.确定土地利用决策中生物多样性保护和生态系统服务提供之间的权衡。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):7971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64668-z.
6
Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.生态系统服务的空间差异及其驱动因素:中国长江经济带三大城市群的比较分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 10;725:138452. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138452. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Responses of ecosystem services to natural and anthropogenic forcings: A spatial regression based assessment in the world's largest mangrove ecosystem.生态系统服务对自然和人为胁迫的响应:世界最大红树林生态系统的基于空间回归的评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 1;715:137004. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137004. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
Contributions of climate change and vegetation greening to evapotranspiration trend in a typical hilly-gully basin on the Loess Plateau, China.气候变化和植被绿化对黄土高原典型沟壑区蒸散发趋势的贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:325-339. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.360. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach.评估生态系统服务的权衡与协同作用:需要更具机制性的方法。
Ambio. 2019 Oct;48(10):1116-1128. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1127-7. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
10
A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming.土壤呼吸、净氮矿化及地上植物生长对实验性生态系统变暖响应的荟萃分析。
Oecologia. 2001 Feb;126(4):543-562. doi: 10.1007/s004420000544. Epub 2001 Feb 1.