Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 7209, Nashville, TN, 37232-8605, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Oct;15(10):1713-1718. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02193-0. Epub 2020 May 14.
Insertion trajectory affects final intracochlear cochlear implant (CI) positioning, but limited information is available intraoperatively regarding ideal trajectory. We sought to improve intracochlear positioning CI electrodes using custom templates to specify insertion trajectory.
3D reconstructions were created from computed tomography of three cadaveric temporal bones. Trajectories co-planar with the straight segment of the cochlea's basal turn were considered ideal. Templates were designed to fit against the drilled mastoid's surface and convey this guided trajectory via a hollow cylinder. Templates were 3D-printed using stereolithography. Mastoidectomy was performed. Template accuracy was tested by measuring target registration error (TRE) for four templates. A novel, roller-based insertion tool (designed to fit within the template cylinder) constrained insertions to intended trajectories. Insertions were performed with MED-EL Standard electrodes in three bones with three conditions: guided trajectory with insertion tool, non-guided trajectory with insertion tool and guided trajectory with surgical forceps. For the final condition, the template was used to mark the mastoid to convey trajectory. Insertion was stopped when electrode buckling occurred.
TRE ranged from 0.23 to 0.73 mm. Mean TRE ± standard deviation was 0.55 ± 0.19 mm. Insertions along guided versus non-guided trajectories averaged more intracochlear electrodes (9, 8, 8 vs. 7, 7, 8) and greater angular insertion depths (AID) (377°, 341°, 320° vs. 278°, 302°, 290°). Insertions performed with forceps using templates as a guide also achieved excellent results (intracochlear electrodes: 10, 7, 8; AID: 478°, 318°, 333°). No translocations occurred.
Custom mastoid-fitting templates reliably specify intended insertion trajectory and provide sufficient information for recreation of that trajectory with manual insertion after template removal. The templates can accurately target structures within the temporal bone with a TRE of 0.55 ± 0.19 mm. Our roller-based insertion tool achieves results comparable to manual insertion using surgical forceps.
插入轨迹会影响最终的人工耳蜗内耳蜗植入物(CI)位置,但术中关于理想轨迹的信息有限。我们试图使用定制模板来指定插入轨迹,以改善人工耳蜗内 CI 电极的定位。
从三个尸体颞骨的计算机断层扫描中创建 3D 重建。与耳蜗基底回的直线段共面的轨迹被认为是理想的。模板设计为贴合钻孔乳突表面,并通过空心圆柱传递此引导轨迹。使用立体光刻技术 3D 打印模板。进行完乳突切除术。通过测量四个模板的目标注册误差(TRE)来测试模板的准确性。一种新的、基于滚轮的插入工具(设计为适合模板圆柱内部)将插入限制在预定轨迹内。在三个骨骼中使用 MED-EL 标准电极进行了三种情况的插入:带插入工具的引导轨迹、带插入工具的非引导轨迹和带手术夹具的引导轨迹。对于最后一种情况,使用模板标记乳突以传递轨迹。当电极弯曲时,插入停止。
TRE 范围为 0.23 至 0.73 毫米。平均 TRE ± 标准偏差为 0.55 ± 0.19 毫米。与非引导轨迹相比,沿引导轨迹插入的人工耳蜗内电极数量更多(9、8、8 对 7、7、8),角度插入深度(AID)更大(377°、341°、320°对 278°、302°、290°)。使用模板作为引导,用夹具进行的插入也取得了很好的效果(人工耳蜗内电极:10、7、8;AID:478°、318°、333°)。没有发生移位。
定制乳突贴合模板可靠地指定了预期的插入轨迹,并在模板移除后手动插入时提供了足够的信息来重现该轨迹。该模板可通过 0.55 ± 0.19 毫米的 TRE 准确地瞄准颞骨内的结构。我们的滚轮式插入工具可实现与使用手术夹具的手动插入相媲美的结果。