Boyer Eric, Karkas Alexandre, Attye Arnaud, Lefournier Virginie, Escude Bernard, Schmerber Sebastien
*Joseph Fourier University-Grenoble 1; †Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Grenoble; ‡Department of Radiology, University Hospital, CHU Grenoble; and §Groupe Clinique du Mail, Grenoble; and ∥Radiologie Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):422-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000705.
To compare the incidence of dislocation of precurved versus straight flexible cochlear implant electrode arrays using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image analyses.
Consecutive nonrandomized case-comparison study.
Tertiary referral center.
Analyses of patients' CBCT images after cochlear implant surgery.
INTERVENTION(S): Precurved and straight flexible electrode arrays from two different manufacturers were implanted. A round window insertion was performed in most cases. Two cases necessitated a cochleostomy. The patients' CBCT images were reconstructed in the coronal oblique, sagittal oblique, and axial oblique section.
The insertion depth angle and the incidence of dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli were determined.
The CBCT images and the incidence of dislocation were analyzed in 54 patients (61 electrode arrays). Thirty-one patients were implanted with a precurved perimodiolar electrode array and 30 patients with a straight flexible electrode array. A total of nine (15%) scalar dislocations were observed in both groups. Eight (26%) scalar dislocations were observed in the precurved array group and one (3%) in the straight array group. Dislocation occurred at an insertion depth angle between 170 and 190 degrees in the precurved array group and at approximately 370 degrees in the straight array group.
With precurved arrays, dislocation usually occurs in the ascending part of the basal turn of the cochlea. With straight flexible electrode arrays, the incidence of dislocation was lower, and it seems that straight flexible arrays have a higher chance of a confined position within the scala tympani than perimodiolar precurved arrays.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像分析比较预弯型与直型柔性人工耳蜗电极阵列脱位的发生率。
连续非随机病例对照研究。
三级转诊中心。
人工耳蜗植入术后患者的CBCT图像分析。
植入来自两个不同制造商的预弯型和直型柔性电极阵列。大多数情况下采用圆窗插入法。2例需要进行耳蜗造瘘术。患者的CBCT图像在冠状斜位、矢状斜位和轴位斜位进行重建。
确定插入深度角度以及从鼓阶到前庭阶的脱位发生率。
对54例患者(61个电极阵列)的CBCT图像和脱位发生率进行了分析。31例患者植入了预弯型蜗周电极阵列,30例患者植入了直型柔性电极阵列。两组共观察到9例(15%)鼓阶脱位。预弯型阵列组观察到8例(26%)鼓阶脱位,直型阵列组观察到1例(3%)。预弯型阵列组脱位发生在插入深度角度为170至190度之间,直型阵列组脱位发生在约370度处。
对于预弯型阵列,脱位通常发生在耳蜗底转的上升部分。对于直型柔性电极阵列,脱位发生率较低,似乎直型柔性阵列比蜗周预弯型阵列在鼓阶内保持受限位置的机会更高。