Lubner Rory J, Kondamuri Neil S, Knoll Renata M, Ward Bryan K, Littlefield Philip D, Rodgers Derek, Abdullah Kalil G, Remenschneider Aaron K, Kozin Elliott D
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 28;11:234. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00234. eCollection 2020.
We aim to examine the existing literature on, and identify knowledge gaps in, the study of adverse animal and human audiovestibular effects from exposure to acoustic or electromagnetic waves that are outside of conventional human hearing. A review was performed, which included searches of relevant MeSH terms using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Primary outcomes included documented auditory and/or vestibular signs or symptoms in animals or humans exposed to infrasound, ultrasound, radiofrequency, and magnetic resonance imaging. The references of these articles were then reviewed in order to identify primary sources and literature not captured by electronic search databases. Infrasound and ultrasound acoustic waves have been described in the literature to result in audiovestibular symptomology following exposure. Technology emitting infrasound such as wind turbines and rocket engines have produced isolated reports of vestibular symptoms, including dizziness and nausea and auditory complaints, such as tinnitus following exposure. Occupational exposure to both low frequency and high frequency ultrasound has resulted in reports of wide-ranging audiovestibular symptoms, with less robust evidence of symptomology following modern-day exposure via new technology such as remote controls, automated door openers, and wireless phone chargers. Radiofrequency exposure has been linked to both auditory and vestibular dysfunction in animal models, with additional historical evidence of human audiovestibular disturbance following unquantifiable exposure. While several theories, such as the cavitation theory, have been postulated as a cause for symptomology, there is extremely limited knowledge of the pathophysiology behind the adverse effects that particular exposure frequencies, intensities, and durations have on animals and humans. This has created a knowledge gap in which much of our understanding is derived from retrospective examination of patients who develop symptoms after postulated exposures. Evidence for adverse human audiovestibular symptomology following exposure to acoustic waves and electromagnetic energy outside the spectrum of human hearing is largely rooted in case series or small cohort studies. Further research on the pathogenesis of audiovestibular dysfunction following acoustic exposure to these frequencies is critical to understand reported symptoms.
我们旨在研究关于暴露于常规人类听力范围之外的声波或电磁波对动物和人类听觉前庭产生不良影响的现有文献,并找出其中的知识空白。我们进行了一项综述,包括使用PubMed、Embase和Scopus搜索相关医学主题词。主要结果包括记录在案的暴露于次声、超声、射频和磁共振成像的动物或人类的听觉和/或前庭体征或症状。然后对这些文章的参考文献进行了审查,以确定电子搜索数据库未收录的主要来源和文献。文献中已描述次声和超声波在暴露后会导致听觉前庭症状。诸如风力涡轮机和火箭发动机等发射次声的技术,已有关于前庭症状的个别报告,包括暴露后出现头晕、恶心以及耳鸣等听觉主诉。职业性暴露于低频和高频超声均导致了广泛的听觉前庭症状报告,而通过遥控器、自动开门器和无线手机充电器等新技术在现代暴露后出现症状的证据则较弱。在动物模型中,射频暴露与听觉和前庭功能障碍均有关联,还有关于无法量化暴露后人类听觉前庭紊乱的更多历史证据。虽然已经提出了一些理论,如空化理论,作为症状产生的原因,但对于特定暴露频率、强度和持续时间对动物和人类产生不良影响背后的病理生理学知之甚少。这造成了一个知识空白,我们的许多理解都源于对假定暴露后出现症状的患者的回顾性研究。暴露于人类听力范围之外的声波和电磁能后出现不良人类听觉前庭症状的证据,很大程度上基于病例系列或小型队列研究。进一步研究这些频率的声波暴露后听觉前庭功能障碍的发病机制,对于理解所报告的症状至关重要。