Ouchi Masayuki, Shiba Takuya
Masayuki Ouchi Eye Clinic, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 27;2020:6143832. doi: 10.1155/2020/6143832. eCollection 2020.
To evaluate the clinical outcome of blended vision combined with micromonovision (MMBV) using a +4 diopter (D) addition power (add) diffractive intraocular lens (MIOL) and a +2.75D add MIOL with a myopic target of -0.5 D.
One hundred twenty eyes of 60 cases were enrolled. The +4 D add MIOLs were placed in the nondominant eye, the +2.75 D add MIOLs were placed in the dominant eye with a myopic target of -0.5 D in 30 cases (the MMBV group), and the +4 D add MIOLs were placed in both eyes in another 30 cases (controls). Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Compared with the controls, binocular uncorrected intermediate vision at 70 cm was significantly better in the MMBV group (=0.02). Contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles per degree and the 6% and 12.5% low-contrast visual acuities were also significantly better in the MMBV group compared with the controls ( values = 0.05, 0.05, and 0.04, respectively). Uncorrected and corrected distance and near VA did not differ significantly between the two groups.
MMBV provided a better intermediate VA, contrast sensitivity, and low-contrast VA than bilateral implantation of the +4 D add MIOL, while preserving comparable near and distance vision.
使用+4屈光度(D)附加光焦度的衍射型人工晶状体(MIOL)和+2.75D附加光焦度的MIOL,以-0.5 D的近视目标评估混合视力联合微单眼视力(MMBV)的临床效果。
纳入60例患者的120只眼。30例患者(MMBV组)将+4 D附加光焦度的MIOL植入非优势眼,将+2.75 D附加光焦度的MIOL植入优势眼,近视目标为-0.5 D;另外30例患者将+4 D附加光焦度的MIOL植入双眼(对照组)。比较两组术后的临床效果。
与对照组相比,MMBV组在70 cm处的双眼未矫正中间视力显著更好(P=0.02)。MMBV组在每度12周时的对比敏感度以及6%和12.5%的低对比度视力也显著优于对照组(P值分别为0.05、0.05和0.04)。两组之间未矫正和矫正的远、近视力差异无统计学意义。
与双侧植入+4 D附加光焦度的MIOL相比,MMBV提供了更好的中间视力、对比敏感度和低对比度视力,同时保留了相当的近视力和远视力。